Whm buff please!

[Noctrin]

WHM:
- hands down outclasses sch in area heals, by far
- more "oh crap" cds (benediction, shroud)
- they have freecure and stuff to help mitigate their mana issues
- higher piety
- best aoe dps in the game

As a sch, i would never go into a raid without a whm, the whm i team up with feels the same about sch. He's better at aoe healing and saving my screwups, i'm better at single target healing and letting my pet patch up straglers and helping reduce his work on aoes. Seems perfect to me?

I think the synergy between whm and sch is one thing se did amazingly well. I honestly can't find anything wrong with it.

[Jyoeru]

If you are running OOM as a WHM, then you, someone you heal with, or players in your party are doing stuff wrong. Remember to use Shroud once you are 1k mana down, not the moment you need it. Our heals are pretty powerful. I am not sure we need a buff. If played correctly, we are pretty good at what we do.

[DSN]

http://www.reddit.com/r/ffxiv/commen...olar_which_is/

[DivineAyumi]

http://www.reddit.com/r/ffxiv/commen...olar_which_is/

Neither healer is best in all situations, and you'll likely want both for your high end raids. Stacking SCH is less viable than stacking WHMs. SCH is more mana efficient, does more damage, and smooths out incoming damage. WHMs have more raw power, recovery abilities, and tools.

^ This.
WHM does not need a buff. I main WHM and there are plenty of content where I can easily outheal a SCH; as well as there are content where a SCH have an easier time than me.

I believe both are perfectly balanced and does not need a nerf/buff of any kind.
If you think a SCH is way better than a WHM then you are just playing your job wrong, very wrong.

[Vid]

Try to heal Coil with only 2 Scholars, you'll see just how much you want a WHM.