Whm buff please!

[Garnatian]

WHM has higher Single Target Healing and better AoE Healing.

[CalvatE]

WHM has higher Single Target Healing and better AoE Healing.

You may want to educate yourself,

[Garnatian]

You may want to educate yourself,

Unfortunately Adloquium has a tenancy of wasting Shield if spammed. So in no way is it a flat 600 Potency. It will fluctuate between 300 and 600, meaning a SCHs single target will sway between 550 and 850, while Cure II + Regen Ticks will heal for a guaranteed 775. I won't include Lustrate as Divine Seal has the potential to out-heal it.

So yeah, SCHs have the potential to out single-target a WHM if they don't clip the shield.

[Derza]

Unfortunately Adloquium has a tenancy of wasting Shield if spammed. So in no way is it a flat 600 Potency. It will fluctuate between 300 and 600, meaning a SCHs single target will sway between 550 and 850, while Cure II + Regen Ticks will heal for a guaranteed 775. I won't include Lustrate as Divine Seal has the potential to out-heal it.

So yeah, SCHs have the potential to out single-target a WHM if they don't clip the shield.

Guaranteed? Remember Overhealing is pretty much the same thing as "Clipping the shield". But anyway, I think both classes are balanced for different things I'd hate to see them balance them to be exactly the same in both areas of single target and raid healing.

[Zezeba]

You may want to educate yourself,

Adloquium Mana Cost - 299
Cure 2 Mana Cost - 266

You'd have to compare the differences in Piety, as well as Aetherflow vs Shroud for a proper mana assessment. All these amateur tier napkin math without an applicable scenario is laughable.

I play both dependent on the encounter/composition so it's much of a muchness for me. Each has their own benefits, but I wouldn't say that one is clearly better than the other 100% of the time.