Dex/Parry tiers - definitive testing methodology needed

[Ruckus]

I wasn't directly addressing you, nor did I mean to push you out of the thread. Apologies if you took offense. Your test sounds useful for all those PALs out there.

I just want too keep focus on the purpose of this thread: to find the exact dex tier for parry chance from dex range 215-250 that causes the big parry chance jump shown in Ninjitsu's data.

[Namasu]

I wasn't directly addressing you, nor did I mean to push you out of the thread. Apologies if you took offense. Your test sounds useful for all those PALs out there.

I just want too keep focus on the purpose of this thread: to find the exact dex tier for parry chance from dex range 215-250 that causes the big parry chance jump shown in Ninjitsu's data.

No offense taken -edited my previous post-, I just don't have the time to go through each dex point to figure out the tier. Your parsing will be much more useful than mine in the long run. In the short term, I want to at least test how dumping at least +45 dex in HQ lvl70 accessories can benefit those that have the time and dedication. If time permit, I'll do w/e else I think will be useful in term of dex vs block vs parry.

[Coramac]

I wasn't directly addressing you, nor did I mean to push you out of the thread. Apologies if you took offense. Your test sounds useful for all those PALs out there.

I just want too keep focus on the purpose of this thread: to find the exact dex tier for parry chance from dex range 215-250 that causes the big parry chance jump shown in Ninjitsu's data.

His data does not show a big parry chance jump. I don't remember what it was exactly, but it showed dex tiers of 14.5 to 22 I think.

I'm not really playing much anymore, but if you run data collection, I'll see if I can make the numbers work. 1000 hit (hits, exclude misses) will be fine for parses but we'll need several data points to make determinations. If you can get them approximately every 10 dex starting at 217 and going up to whatever you want to stop at. If you could do multiple tests at each point, that'd be better, but it might be workable without.