"prolly" is not good enough for me to accept.
I did a quick google search and found this link :
http://www.siliconera.com/2013/11/05...r7FHL86rSAW.99
If those numbers mean fail after having a game out for 2+ months than I will gladly take that cash off their hands so they can relaunch the game to cater to self-made economic experts like yourself lol.
November 22 Live Letter, December 22 another Live Letter. December 25 or 31 is probably 2.1, so I don't see it delayed until January. I think a lot will quit since there is no way Coil will hold people for another 3 Months.http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodest...bc3399670337c6
On the 22nd there will be a new live letter.
However the post shows:
Since the gap between live letters is 1 month kinda, will 2.1 be delayed to january?
Dude, i just expressed my opinion. What am i asking you to accept?"prolly" is not good enough for me to accept.
I did a quick google search and found this link :
http://www.siliconera.com/2013/11/05...r7FHL86rSAW.99
If those numbers mean fail after having a game out for 2+ months than I will gladly take that cash off their hands so they can relaunch the game to cater to self-made economic experts like yourself lol.
And now im a self made economic expert? Having a tough day huh? Or just high on something?
Last edited by Noutaja; 11-12-2013 at 05:18 PM.
no, but pulling out of thin air (you never said "in my opinion") that there are more unsubs than actual subs is not accurate. I googled accurate information and posted it here, big deal that I didn't take your word for it. lol
And where did i state i had accurate information or information at all? I stated my hunch as a vague opinion, with even using the word "prolly" as you referred. Your reactions seriousness is ridiculous.
And lose yours, mine and other players money we have given them these 3 months? They are getting paid and developing meanwhile.I would have been totally fine with waiting 6 or even 9 months for the release of ARR if that meant getting a finished, polished MMO (with PvP, Housing, more dungeons, right-clic features, a secured server-side, a better netcode…) worthy of comparison with the best titles in terms of gameplay consistency (worldwide), endgame content variety, and replayability (a decent alternative to FATE).
Hell, they could have skipped the PS3 altogether and focus entirely on PC/PS4 for that matter, saving time (before release) and probable future complications (managing many different platforms, among which the PS3 is quite an alien architecture to accommodate for the game's engine, which they must now support until the very end). It could have been a much more robust product to begin with. Granted, they might have sold a bit less boxes at launch, due to the PS4 installed base being much smaller than the PS3, but in the long run (think from now until 2020…), I'm confident this would have been a pretty sound business and technical call.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.