Thread: Warrior "buff" in 2.1: not what we are expecting?

Originally Posted by Bigpurpleharness

I'm not saying WAR can't take anything, I'm saying you're probably better served learning math and scientific method if you can't identify one is better suited for mitigating damage with 15 seconds and mental math. I don't care if it makes you feel special that you're doing something the hard way for shits and giggles. The goal is to make classes balanced, and again, 15 seconds and some mental math...

Seriously, it's getting to 2 months after launch and people are still "theorycrafting" WAR while other jobs are already theorycrafted and have rotations established. That is telling. People are not playing WAR and so they don't know how to do it.



I don't bother any more with the theorycrafting because I already know the rotations and skill-combos for a variety of ingame situations. I've communicated these to my team and anyone else with ears to listen. We have strats crafted in Coil and that's all we need. There's no need for the "scientific method" when you already know what works and what doesn't.

Originally Posted by CurlyBruce

So Thrill of Battle is the same as Hallowed Ground....except that you have to blow your other cooldowns to survive the same 10s a PLD does doing literally nothing. You also don't seem to realize that a PLD has other cooldowns as well.

Those are cool downs you would have used anyway...... -.- You literally do nothing different than what you were doing before.

WAR is getting Inner Beast and Wrath modified to placate a playerbase that took offense at Yoshi P's words at the TGS instead of taking them to heart. That and the fact that PLD was OP to begin with. There's not much more to it than that.

WAR is fine. It's not OP but there's nothin wrong with it.

Originally Posted by HiirNoivl

Seriously, it's getting to 2 months after launch and people are still "theorycrafting" WAR while other jobs are already theorycrafted and have rotations established. That is telling. People are not playing WAR and so they don't know how to do it.

We finished the theorycrafting on the major aspects of the class that you're arguing about a long time ago. The only reason it keeps getting brought up is because there are loads of people out there just like you that suffer so heavily from confirmation bias that you're willing to ignore the math because it doesn't fit with your cherry picked and observationally skewed anecdotal evidence.

The fact that you still think that WAR is fine when it's been gone over *numerous* times that it's not just l2p that WAR is *explicitly* inferior to PLD just shows how much you're willing to ignore to satisfy your own preconceived notion that you're so amazing that you break the math.