What resources? They are working on the game regardless.
What resources? They are working on the game regardless.
My XIVPad: http://xivpads.com?2031148
My XIVPad: http://xivpads.com?2031148
Ok granted, this is absolutely correct.
I'm trying to tie in their "risk assessment" statement. I believe that they will consider what will get them the best outcome for the use of the resources they have available.
Between Jump and Chocobos which would bring in more subscribers?
Jump and Story Quests?
And continue on like that, jump will remain on the back burner until most of what people want becomes implemented. By that point people may be happy with the game and jump won't even need to be considered.
I think I lost where I was going with that.
yeah and thats why its low priorityOk granted, this is absolutely correct.
I'm trying to tie in their "risk assessment" statement. I believe that they will consider what will get them the best outcome for the use of the resources they have available.
Between Jump and Chocobos which would bring in more subscribers?
Jump and Story Quests?
And continue on like that, jump will remain on the back burner until most of what people want becomes implemented. By that point people may be happy with the game and jump won't even need to be considered.
I think I lost where I was going with that.
and will stay low priority
there are so many things that will need to come first
My XIVPad: http://xivpads.com?2031148
Then again, some people who voted for limited jump would not have voted in favour of jump at all if "limited" hadn't been an option. Some would have voted no. So the votes for limited jump can't be taken as "for jump" but only as it says.. "for limited jump."
Edit:
Some who voted for limited wouldn't hate unlimited jump, but would prefer limited.
Some who voted for limited would hate unlimited jump and not vote for it.
It's not so black and white, and can't be seen as only for or against.
Last edited by Nabiri; 05-23-2011 at 04:26 PM. Reason: Further clarification
~She gave her heart to a falling star~
~~~★~~~
If he's not here, then where?
~~~★~~~
~Been searching for my Afterman~
~She gave her heart to a falling star~
~~~★~~~
If he's not here, then where?
~~~★~~~
~Been searching for my Afterman~
How is voting for an option that readsThen again, some people who voted for limited jump would not have voted in favour of jump at all if "limited" hadn't been an option. Some would have voted no. So the votes for limited jump can't be taken as "for jump" but only as it says.. "for limited jump."
Edit:
Some who voted for limited wouldn't hate unlimited jump, but would prefer limited.
Some who voted for limited would hate unlimited jump and not vote for it.
It's not so black and white, and can't be seen as only for or against.= not being for jump?Like if you WANT jumping Limited
Thank you for understanding the reason for this thread and explaining it better than I can.Then again, some people who voted for limited jump would not have voted in favour of jump at all if "limited" hadn't been an option. Some would have voted no. So the votes for limited jump can't be taken as "for jump" but only as it says.. "for limited jump."
Edit:
Some who voted for limited wouldn't hate unlimited jump, but would prefer limited.
Some who voted for limited would hate unlimited jump and not vote for it.
It's not so black and white, and can't be seen as only for or against.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.