[Dev1008] Makeshift Jumping Implementation Poll

[Alise]

@op, i know what u meant there, but that option isnt a mid grey one because it only effect the white zone.

@seraphite , sorry to say your self assumption reply just make you l
ook immature. This is my opinion base on this topic only.
I could careless on what happen to those ego competition topics.

@wynn yes, i just point it out awhile ago. Anyone who take credit in psychology would know what wrong here (it is one of the trick private company like to do when they want result to be one favor )

People can vote both, but most will psychologically choose one.

[Evangela]

Jumping command is not gonna work

going near the cliff, pressing Home, select "Jump" command....

just make the game look worse

[TheVedis]

Jumping command is not gonna work

going near the cliff, pressing Home, select "Jump" command....

just make the game look worse

stop acting like you understand how these games are actualy programmed

you seem to be one of the few who do not understand, you just dont put in a button to jump and it magicaly happens

theres a TON of work that goes behind it(and the most expensive part will be the animations involved)

[Wilhelmina]

All I think of when I read about people who are against the addition of a feature to this game is a hipster. Why would you act negatively toward a great addition to a struggling game, what do you have to gain from acting that way? People who don't want more features deserve the original crappy FFXIV they were tricked into buying.

[SuzakuCMX]

All I think of when I read about people who are against the addition of a feature to this game is a hipster. Why would you act negatively toward a great addition to a struggling game, what do you have to gain from acting that way? People who don't want more features deserve the original crappy FFXIV they were tricked into buying.

Great addition how? Nobody has said anything that makes jumping necessary or logical other than "I want it" or "all the new MMOs have it."

Scaling cliffs? You can do that already, making it a jump/fall animation rather than a strange spiderwalk doesn't change anything.

There is no use for a jump right now.

And I still would prefer the kind in FFXIII They could all really cool jumping animations for those.

[Elexia]

All I think of when I read about people who are against the addition of a feature to this game is a hipster. Why would you act negatively toward a great addition to a struggling game

Because it's not a great feature? It's not going to save the game? There's other important additions that can be added? Like Content and Battle/Class(job) system revisions?

What I don't get is why people think you just slap the feature in and it'll just instantly do everything. It's like slapping down a gun in an FPS without programming the ability to have it shoot.

[Leeloo]

Some kind of jump?

Not sure if you understand but the point of the 2 jump options is either "Unlimited Jumping" where you could jump anywhere and anytime you want or "Limited Jumping" where you could only jump at specific locations at specific times. If there wasn't a need for the limited jump option people wouldn't have liked it and would have liked the unlimited option instead and vice versa.

The fact that both jump options got liked means that people disagree on what kind of jumping should be available if implemented

Meowy has a point, however the people that liked both jumping options are probably only a handful.

Yes, I understand the 2 different jumping options. But if one wanted to look at the poll as pro-jump vs anti-jump they simply need to add the 2 jump votes together. Makes sense to me...

[Nabiri]

Yes, I understand the 2 different jumping options. But if one wanted to look at the poll as pro-jump vs anti-jump they simply need to add the 2 jump votes together. Makes sense to me...

Then again, some people who voted for limited jump would not have voted in favour of jump at all if "limited" hadn't been an option. Some would have voted no. So the votes for limited jump can't be taken as "for jump" but only as it says.. "for limited jump."

Edit:
Some who voted for limited wouldn't hate unlimited jump, but would prefer limited.
Some who voted for limited would hate unlimited jump and not vote for it.

It's not so black and white, and can't be seen as only for or against.

[Leeloo]

Then again, some people who voted for limited jump would not have voted in favour of jump at all if "limited" hadn't been an option. Some would have voted no. So the votes for limited jump can't be taken as "for jump" but only as it says.. "for limited jump."

Edit:
Some who voted for limited wouldn't hate unlimited jump, but would prefer limited.
Some who voted for limited would hate unlimited jump and not vote for it.

It's not so black and white, and can't be seen as only for or against.

How is voting for an option that reads

Like if you WANT jumping Limited

= not being for jump?

[BloodLotus]

How is voting for an option that reads = not being for jump?

Read Nabiri's post again.

I'm sure you'll get it eventually.