Quote Originally Posted by AccountBanned View Post
So looks is what you're into?

Lets take Diablo 2 and 3 as examples for a moment...remember Diablo 2? One of the greatest games made? I had the most horrible computer back in the day and Diablo 2 ran fine on it..LOOKS were not the focus but instead it was gameplay. Look at Diablo 3...people literally bought the game and had to go out and purchase a new computer just to play it...I know because I'm one of the people who did it and did so only to find out that Diablo 3 is a horrible game compared to Diablo 2.

True gamers aren't into games for their looks but instead because of gameplay. I'll hop on FF7 today and play it with a smile on my face because the gameplay was top notch and still puts games to shame today. Enjoy spending $1000+ though so you can stare at real-life looking water in a game when you could have just took a quick trip out of your home to see water for the cost of the gas to get there.

Its not all about graphics, it never has been.I totally agree, gameplay trumps all.
D2 is awesome, d3 is the biggest letdown of the year ( heck last 5 years ). Thats not nostalgia, i was 24 when d2 came out, i remember it well. Poe > d3.
My recent games i have replayed are fallout 2, planescape torment, systemshock 2, dungeon siege 2 and wizardry 7. I couldnt care less about the graphics.

Now, with that being said, since i play alot of games for many hours, why wouldnt i want the best computer money can buy ( so to speak )?
Would you rather play skyrim on a toaster with everything turned down, running like crap, all choppy and laggy or would you rather play it on ultra where the game runs like a dream and it it nice to look at to boot??