I find it highly suspect that you agree the contest was held poorly yet you defend their right to hold contests poorly. You say the items should be prestigious, yet the items were not earned fairly. The contest rules emphasized quite clearly that entries that won were to be the best entries and that there were many ways in which a post could be disqualified. They did not follow their own rules for selection and many people, even winners, were extremely confused by this. If they plan to hold contests in the future for, as you say, prestigious items they should do so fairly or not at all.
We were very content to wait on a response. You are the one who decided to slander others in your defensiveness.