Balancing WAR: A Game of Graphs

[Aegrus]

Well written. Graphs could use a brief caption to describe each trendline( I know it's redundant, but it's a fail safe) I.e. Hold( no Inner beast, wrath only). Conclusion could use a recap of your suggested fix, which could work well. Also, the graphs could have clearer titles. Also, list any assumptions from the beginning, or again in a brief summary for each graph)

All said and done, great work. I agree with your view. Warriors are not set up to scale with incoming damage.

[Gamemako]

Better WAR Rotations:

Thank you, I will look into addressing these further.

Gilthas, please don't come to these threads complaining about how they are written up.

Please understand that some of the issues he pointed out I have already improved. I intend to do further improvements, time permitting, to improve readability. I just added a summary to the top as well -- stopping shy of calling it an abstract, anyway.

Graphs could use a brief caption to describe each trendline( I know it's redundant, but it's a fail safe) I.e. Hold( no Inner beast, wrath only). Conclusion could use a recap of your suggested fix, which could work well. Also, the graphs could have clearer titles. Also, list any assumptions from the beginning, or again in a brief summary for each graph)

Yes, I definitely should include titles and captions. I even confused myself at one point due to their absence. I ended up with too many, and the lack of titles was largely due to my habit of copying and inserting new data into the chart, so I didn't have to completely redo the formatting each time.