Quote Originally Posted by Tiggy View Post
Actually, they've acknowledged on multiple occasions that they dropped the graphics to support the ps3 and to support lower end pc's. They absolutely did do exactly what you say they weren't. As it stood there was a very good reason the existing engine for 1.0 wasn't ported to the ps3, and it wasn't entirely because the game sucked.
They did say they lowered some graphics to make it run better on lower end pcs but not for ps3. Again we're forget that it WAS going to come for ps3 and was postponed for the specific reason of not feeling it right to release a game that they admitted was unfinished. And for no other reason. Clearly 1.0 was better graphically and that WAS coming to ps3. And I guess I'm just imagining that my pc version looks 10 times better then the ps3 version?
I mean if they were limiting the pc version for ps3 then why doesn't both versions look the same? Because they don't do that, any decision that's a limitation of the pc version is taking the performance of the game in mind. Fate battles would not be possible if they hadn't made the adjustments that they did. Both versions are limited by how they want the game to run at its core game design (displaying more characters on screen to make fate battle possible, lowering textures to improves movement speed and rendering times along with animation lag) and each system is limited graphically by its own hardware, one doesn't impact the other