WAR Dex and Parry testing!

[Sakasa]

He's got a control test for Dex with the first one. It's Dex with no gear. He increased dex and parry on his second test with no increase in parry rate.

I assumed it was and i also assumed many more then 200 trials for each of the data listed. Just laying out the experiment i suppose.

[C-croft]

I assumed it was and i also assumed many more then 200 trials for each of the data listed. Just laying out the experiment i suppose.

He states he did 5000 per test.

[Coramac]

I assumed it was and i also assumed many more then 200 trials for each of the data listed. Just laying out the experiment i suppose.

You mean like 200 hits per parse? That gets you no where. 200 trials of 5k hits is way overkill... that's like 1400 hours of parsing per group. That's like... literally a year of parsing.

[Ninjiitstu]

You mean like 200 hits per parse? That gets you no where. 200 trials of 5k hits is way overkill... that's like 1400 hours of parsing per group. That's like... literally a year of parsing.

Yeah... Not doing that.

[Sakasa]

You mean like 200 hits per parse? That gets you no where. 200 trials of 5k hits is way overkill... that's like 1400 hours of parsing per group. That's like... literally a year of parsing.

Mis used trial it would be a data set (set per occurance hits/miss/parry). Meaning I do not doubt there was enough rounds to lead to an appriopriate Nth degree estimation similar to I do not doubt there was a control. While I am not a fan of negative control it was just say I do not doubt the experiement was done correctly.

[Coramac]

Mis used trial it would be a data set (set per occurance hits/miss/parry). Meaning I do not doubt there was enough rounds to lead to an appriopriate Nth degree estimation similar to I do not doubt there was a control. While I am not a fan of negative control it was just say I do not doubt the experiement was done correctly.

An appropriate Nth degree? I don't understand. We aren't dealing with a population. What's appropriate? This subjective comment should be quantified as it can be calculated.

Additionally, this isn't science. This isn't an experiment. This is modeling and statistics.