Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. 10-02-2013 05:57 AM #1
    Exitusworld
    Player
    Exitusworld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    41
    Character
    Dark Sage
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50

    ampador keep tree glitch.

    Did an AK run other day and the people i got put with did some weird glitch/exploit where whm/healer goes up in a tree at first boss and cant be attacked by the golem adds leaving us to just dps boss down. woulda just left the group as i didnt really like how they were playing upto that point even but DPS que times are horrid some days.
    (0)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-02-2013 06:04 AM #2
    Orophin
    Player
    Orophin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    3,446
    Character
    Orophin Calmcacil
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 50
    I've only been in one group where someone said to do this. The rest of the party refused to exploit the system so he just went with the flow.
    (0)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-02-2013 06:11 AM #3
    NeoZehel
    Player
    NeoZehel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    133
    Character
    Zehel Sterben
    World
    Adamantoise
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 50
    Aww I hope they don't remove the tree now I jump on the tree and mess around while the fight is explained for newbies. Once the actual fight starts I jump out. Who needs an exploit for that boss anyways? For some players (with horrible jumping "skills") it would take them longer to get into the tree than it would to fight the boss.
    (0)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-02-2013 06:13 AM #4
    Blazn
    Player
    Blazn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    limsa... FUK that place
    Posts
    169
    Character
    Blazn Pyro
    World
    Midgardsormr
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    hell my fc group normally ignores them but not while in a tree lol
    (0)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »