When 2.0 finally opens up, I'm wondering if we will all remain in the "same" servers? I have friends in multiple LSs and it would be terrible if both LSs decided on separate worlds. On that subject will we keep our LSs as well?
When we enter 2.0...
Printable View
-
07-14-2012, 07:49 AMNintenPyjak64When we enter 2.0...
-
07-14-2012, 07:50 AMRokienDon't worry you will beable to create 8 chars on every server or whatever.Quote:
Originally Posted by NintenPyjak64
-
07-14-2012, 10:58 AMViritess
I doubt they will break us up in any random fashion. I would make the asumption that we will be on the "same" servers we are now. And any transfering if it would happen, would come another time.
After all besides all the hassle for the player base of being split up. SE will likely have their hands full transfering our current data over and making sure the servers are good and stable once we all crash the gates giggling like little kids.
Besides if i couldn't stay with Seraphim it just wouldn't be as fun anymore :( -
07-14-2012, 11:12 AMRuisuWell that's a relief. No longer am I going to be screwed over by awful payment methods!Quote:
Originally Posted by Rokien
Also, we should revert back to old server names. Instead of Sargatanas, which sounds awful. We sould be Lindblum. It's only fair. -
07-14-2012, 11:14 AMRokienyou sir are crazy, it's terrible idea to allow people to creat 8 chars on multiple servers. I also love Sargatanas.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruisu
http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...haracter-slots Yes, I have a thread for that. -
07-14-2012, 11:23 AMRuisuAhahaha, you think I'm clicking that shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rokien
And no, it's not. Because a p2p MMO limiting me to only one character unless I pay $1 more per character is a load of shit. I don't care about your immersion. It's a load of shit. I'm glad they're dropping that plan.
Sargatanas sucks. I want Lindblum back. -
07-14-2012, 11:25 AMNintenPyjak64I believe before they change the server names keep them as the current names for probably a Month untill everybody gets situated.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruisu
-
07-14-2012, 11:30 AMBabydoll
Who cares what the name of the server is lol...>.>
I thought they were redoing the names of the servers and making more for the official launch but I have no idea :o -
07-14-2012, 11:32 AMElexiaYeah it sucks paying for shit in a P2P MMO, it's better playing for free and having to buy everything else including zone access.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruisu
-
07-14-2012, 11:34 AMNintenPyjak64I'd rather pay the money I am now (and with Legacy later) instead of $100 a month on Pay2Win games personally. =pQuote:
Originally Posted by Elexia
-
07-14-2012, 11:38 AMViritess8 chars per server hardly answers the question of friends and LS mates staying together...Quote:
Originally Posted by Rokien
i..just...don't understand it...its as if your answering with a line that can lead you into complaining about something you don't like.
Anyway, I wouldn't worry about you LS or friends being tossed around the serververse, that would be some major league foot shooting by SE. And if your LS or friends wish to re-locate servers IF they provide such an option (which i personally doubt since they sorta just did that) I expect they would inform you so you could decide for yourself if you want to stay or go. -
07-14-2012, 11:38 AMNaltaStrifeLegacy states 8 characters per server for a maximum of 40 characters, which would be 5 servers you could max your character list on. Having that many maximum characters you could make a multiple characters in every server, but you couldn't have 8 in each.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rokien
Just facts, no disrespect meant. -
07-14-2012, 11:40 AMElexiaSame, that's why I don't mind an extra dollar or two, as they'll get access to everything (when unlocked) xD.Quote:
Originally Posted by NintenPyjak64
-
07-14-2012, 11:40 AMRuisuI actually dislike most f2p games like GW2/GW and whatnot. Nice assumptions though. Paying $1 more for each character slot ($3 in this game lol) is retarded. Yoshida has acknowledged this as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elexia
It doesn't do anything to the servers, nor is it a problem to be allowed multiple character slots. Don't know why people are so against it. -
07-14-2012, 11:46 AMRokienPretty sure she is for it, I am against it. If you clicked that link you can read why :D.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruisu
-
07-14-2012, 04:02 PMyukikaze_yanagi
Whatever. 2.0 should come with another free transfer at launch
-
07-14-2012, 04:07 PMMasamune1004Umm, this game already allows you to do that you know...Quote:
Originally Posted by Rokien
-
07-14-2012, 05:05 PMAlokin1988GW and GW2 are B2P brosef. F2P would be something like Lotro or D&DO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruisu
-
07-14-2012, 07:06 PMFunkyCould'nt agree more.Quote:
Originally Posted by yukikaze_yanagi
-
07-14-2012, 07:32 PMyukikaze_yanagiit isn't a request. It's already been stated in the past they'll doQuote:
Originally Posted by Funky
-
07-14-2012, 08:03 PMMirage
I don't see any other option than keeping everyone on the same worlds that we are on already. We're all high level and have all the best shit (well, some of us), I would think that many new players would prefer to be on a world where there is a lot of other new players, so that they would have an actual low and midgame to play. Mixing new players with players who have every job and craft at 50 is probably not a good idea for at least the first few months. After the new servers have grown and gotten a sustainable economy on their own, us oldbies might be able to switch servers if we want.
Of course, the game shouldn't deny new players access to the old worlds, it should just recommend them to join the new ones. -
07-14-2012, 08:38 PMFunkyawesome!Quote:
Originally Posted by yukikaze_yanagi
/99char