Manderville Weapon Class Categorization

Devs:

These new weapons are restricted to single classes, such as Summoner, and does not take into account the need to attach that weapon to the subclass of Arcanist. This creates yet another issue in inventory/armory management now for players with all classes. Please consider adding the subclasses to these weapons so we do not have to keep 2 weapons in the armory to access the various classes we are working with.

Thank you for the consideration.

Is arcanist locked out of using the smn relic? That would be good, I hope this gets expanded to all gear past level 30.

This has always been the case with these. You do not need to use arcanist ever.

No, please don't take base Classes into consideration!

You literally don't need to keep 2 weapons. Once you obtain the job stone, you have no reason to nor should you ever be playing content without it equipped. So no, there is no need for them to take base classes into account ever.

This has been the case ever since the level 50 relics – The Veil of Wiyu is restricted to SMN, even though classes are still semi-relevant at that point.

By level 90 you should never have any need to be an arcanist unless you're doing some kind of novelty class-only challenge with friends.

If you are still switching jobs by manually switching weapons, don't. Gearsets are your friend and you should be using them to bypass classes and switch straight from job to job.

OP has level 90 on every job, surely they understand how the job system works...this has to be a troll post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bringer-of-Omens

These new weapons are restricted to single classes, such as Summoner

---

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/...27/cover10.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ransu

OP has level 90 on every job, surely they understand how the job system works...this has to be a troll post.

---

Just because you dont need to play those classes does not mean you dont need to access or have reason to use them. For those who use them as storage for hotbar builds it is an issue, as is storage and inventory management in general. This is a small change which does not unbalance gameplay in any way.

Radiant and Lunar Envoy gear both include the class and subclass btw so it isnt something outmoded or not currently considered.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bringer-of-Omens

Just because you dont need to play those classes does not mean you dont need to access or have reason to use them. For those who use them as storage for hotbar builds it is an issue, as is storage and inventory management in general. This is a small change which does not unbalance gameplay in any way.

Radiant and Lunar Envoy gear both include the class and subclass btw so it isnt something outmoded or not currently considered.

---

You handle it the same way you do when you need to hand over the relic for upgrading while being on that job. Find a spare weapon or buy a starter one for temp use for like 100 gil.


All job gear is job exclusive and has never included classes. That's kind of the point of it. It's job specific. The other stuff isn't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bringer-of-Omens

Devs:

These new weapons are restricted to single classes, such as Summoner, and does not take into account the need to attach that weapon to the subclass of Arcanist. This creates yet another issue in inventory/armory management now for players with all classes. Please consider adding the subclasses to these weapons so we do not have to keep 2 weapons in the armory to access the various classes we are working with.

Thank you for the consideration.

---

Relics have literally always been like this, all the way back to Zodiac

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bringer-of-Omens

Just because you dont need to play those classes does not mean you dont need to access or have reason to use them. For those who use them as storage for hotbar builds it is an issue, as is storage and inventory management in general. This is a small change which does not unbalance gameplay in any way.

Radiant and Lunar Envoy gear both include the class and subclass btw so it isnt something outmoded or not currently considered.

---

That's the dumbest thing I've read today.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bringer-of-Omens

Radiant and Lunar Envoy gear both include the class and subclass btw so it isnt something outmoded or not currently considered.

---

Are these also examples of "relic" weapons?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RobynDaBank

No, please don't take base Classes into consideration!

---

I think they should take base classes into consideration....when adjusting content above level 30 to REQUIRE job stones to queue up for it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bringer-of-Omens

Devs:

These new weapons are restricted to single classes, such as Summoner, and does not take into account the need to attach that weapon to the subclass of Arcanist. This creates yet another issue in inventory/armory management now for players with all classes. Please consider adding the subclasses to these weapons so we do not have to keep 2 weapons in the armory to access the various classes we are working with.

Thank you for the consideration.

---

Stupid suggestion (if not trolling), ignore it for it has no value

I'd rather have the classes removed entirely, with job upgrading into the class at 30 rather than this current outdated weird system where job is upgrade from class but both coexist for some reason. There is no reason for classes to exist with the way game went.

you gonna need a second weapon anyway as soon as you want to uograde your relic

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bringer-of-Omens

Devs:

These new weapons are restricted to single classes, such as Summoner, and does not take into account the need to attach that weapon to the subclass of Arcanist. This creates yet another issue in inventory/armory management now for players with all classes. Please consider adding the subclasses to these weapons so we do not have to keep 2 weapons in the armory to access the various classes we are working with.

Thank you for the consideration.

---

as it has always been done before?