Please, don't make winning required to for temporary rewards

relying on random matchmaking already makes winning in PVP a complete cointoss, having temporary rewards such as the garo mounts requiring a certain number of victories is just ludicruous.

next time just make the achievements require a specific number of matches played.

But than everyone, even their grandmothers, can have that mount - you can just stand in CC and do nothing, i saw a few times, even on non ranked. Getting PVP mount just for participating - nah. At least not all 3. Also, pvp event lasted for like 4 months? Plenty of time to get your wins.

Yeah, no thanks. There's already people that stand around doing nothing for free XP, we sure as shit don't need more freeloaders standing around doing zilch for free mounts too.

honestly if you dont win you should get NOTHING!!!!!..

maybe then players would actually make an effort... and it'd stop players queuing up just for the free exp.

seems to be one of the reasons pvp sucks as much as it does is because 3/4 of people are only there for the exp bonus and couldnt care less

If GARO lasts around 4yrs like it did last time, you got plenty of time to keep trying to obtain your mounts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Valabrog

But than everyone, even their grandmothers, can have that mount - you can just stand in CC and do nothing, i saw a few times, even on non ranked. Getting PVP mount just for participating - nah. At least not all 3. Also, pvp event lasted for like 4 months? Plenty of time to get your wins.

---

that's already the case, just throw yourself at enough matches and eventually you'll get teams that carry you to victory. when i first started CC i got a 6-win streak despite not even knowing how to avoid the wind kockback simply because i got lucky in matchmaking

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NorthernLadMSP

Yeah, no thanks. There's already people that stand around doing nothing for free XP, we sure as shit don't need more freeloaders standing around doing zilch for free mounts too.

---

so if you get assigned a team with people who stand around doing nothing you should be punished for it despite doing everything you can to win?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Melethron123

so if you get assigned a team with people who stand around doing nothing you should be punished for it despite doing everything you can to win?

---

You're not punished. You still get XP or tomes even if you came in last place with literally zero points at the end of the match. But, this suggestion does nothing other than promote freeloading even harder than we see now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NorthernLadMSP

You're not punished. You still get XP or tomes even if you came in last place with literally zero points at the end of the match. But, this suggestion does nothing other than promote freeloading even harder than we see now.

---

Need a report page for SE JUST for AFK farmers/botters so we can report them rapid fire every match

Frontline wins were bit annoying but CC wins just flow in no time. It doesn't take much time or effort to do either.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dzian

honestly if you dont win you should get NOTHING!!!!!..

maybe then players would actually make an effort... and it'd stop players queuing up just for the free exp.

seems to be one of the reasons pvp sucks as much as it does is because 3/4 of people are only there for the exp bonus and couldnt care less

---

I think you should still get a little something for losing, a consolation prize. But I think they should make a loss (3rd place in FL) reward only a small amount of tomes and XP, and instead greatly increase the rewards for winning/2nd and 1st place - 1st place in FL should give you more than it already gives you right now.

It's the simplest way of incentivizing players to actually *try* and win and play to win I can think of. Anyone that gets salty or toxic about losing... well, that's what GMs are for.

Put in the matches+effort and wins will naturally accumulate.