https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodes...9ca96a154cef76
"We will continue to work on identifying the cause of the issue and addressing it so that the lottery system correctly determines the winner and displays the proper results."
I hope this means they will correctly determine the winner for this round of lotto, and isnt aimed at only the future.
The wording concerns me.
Lodestone update on housing
Printable View
-
04-17-2022, 05:04 AMMarkfreshLodestone update on housing
-
04-17-2022, 05:04 AMStormpeaks
Auto Demo 2.0 anyone ? Still waiting on it to come back ? How are they going to be able to fix the lottery but not bring back auto demo ?
-
04-17-2022, 05:06 AMLily_Skyehttps://i.imgur.com/Zg9Fui1.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Markfresh
-
04-17-2022, 05:07 AMAeika
it doesnt address people who reclaimed their gil after 5 hours of silence, which concerns me. Since my FC reclaimed our gil, we're just s* out of luck?
-
04-17-2022, 05:07 AMFaytCruz
So whatever bug this is we now got to wait till sometime after Wednesday results are over if dosent go back further and then knowing then gonna make us wait in another 5 day lottery period when get it fix that real nice
-
04-17-2022, 05:08 AMSapphireWeapon
So what happens if it comes out that the rumors are true and anyone who put in their bid prior to the emergency maintenance on the 13th had their bid wiped out of the system? Would they just wipe it clean and do it all again? I can't see them taking people's houses away from them, but what do they do for the people who got screwed out of a chance before the lot was ever drawn? I'm included in that group, so I want answers.
-
04-17-2022, 05:08 AMDenji
What... What if we refunded out gil? :|
-
04-17-2022, 05:09 AMMarkfreshLets hope that if you were the winner that when you go to the placard it then gives you the option to hand over the gil again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeika
-
04-17-2022, 05:11 AMFaytCruzYeah hope so would won mine since I was the only one in it for my FC to be screw over by this now I got to wait another week+ for them to fix it and all got a hope they still consider me the winnerQuote:
Originally Posted by Markfresh
-
04-17-2022, 05:13 AMAeikaThats what I HOPE happens, but if they cant code "roll *1-7*" correctly...Quote:
Originally Posted by Markfresh
-
04-17-2022, 05:16 AMAlussira
The housing system in this game seems to be unfair in all respects. Housing for personal use should be reserved for sanctuaries with the ability to upgrade and leave the wards to FCs. That way anyone who wants a home, gets a home and there is not of this waiting bs when the system screws up and then everyone is out of luck. Just my own thoughts. agree to disagree if you like, but I honestly feel it would have been a better method of handling this.
-
04-17-2022, 05:27 AMKhalitharThat is the only acceptable solution. Anything less than that should complained about on the forums until they make it that way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Markfresh
-
04-17-2022, 05:30 AMKelthorIt's not true. My FC and I all bid immediately the morning it was open, and we won our plot.Quote:
Originally Posted by SapphireWeapon
It had 18 bids total by the end. -
04-17-2022, 05:41 AMBroBit_Will
My FC had the only bid on a plot and still lost. I'm afraid my FC will never get a house at this rate. It is extremely disappointing.
-
04-17-2022, 05:43 AMPacketdancerI actually think they should flip it the other way. As I've detailed in other threads (often enough I'm sure some of you have heard this before), I think FCs should not be able to have ward housing; I think FCs should have instanced housing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alussira
Specifically, I think FCs should have instanced airships.
The airship would have a big top deck (where you could use exterior housing decorations), a greenhouse (where you could grow and crossbreed plants -- and, heck, potentially have more than three garden plots to use), personal rooms, and a company workshop. This way, any FC over a certain rank would have immediate, guaranteed access to systems gated on housing (like gardening and the company workshop). And since it's an instanced airship, you could literally have 'vistas' visible through the windows or off the top deck. Tired of your ship being parked off the coast of La Noscea with Limsa visible? Have an FC officer go pilot it off the coast of Kugane. Or off the coast of Eureka, or over the ruins of Mhach, or over Mor Dhona with the Crystal Tower visible in the distance, or whatever else; because you aren't making wards -- just "what do you see visible when you look off the edge of the airship" -- you can make so many different types of interesting vistas, and the airship can be piloted around whenever folks want a change of scenery.
That wouldn't remotely "solve" housing demand, but it would ensure that no FC had to struggle for a house to be able to participate in things like having a company workshop, and it would also remove FCs from the contention for housing plots (thus at least freeing up a non-zero amount of plots for personal housing, and also putting an end to the create-a-dummy-FC shenanigans people use to obtain houses).
Though it still does leave the existing issue with instanced housing, that you potentially overload the housing servers and require constant expansion of them as more and more instanced airships get allocated. And this game's architecture does not seem well-suited to dynamic allocation of new assets... even if we weren't in a global pandemic that's had an adverse affect on the availability of a number of parts vital to many electronics (thus making it hard to get the additional servers if you need to expand).
(But having FC houses be the instanced ones would at least make for a slower rate of instance allocation than having the personal houses be instanced would.) -
04-17-2022, 05:46 AMArriusProbably not even that, since some likely have taken their house deposit out of the sign and have no way to put it back in when SE decides to reroll the 0 ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by Khalithar
-
04-17-2022, 05:48 AMDodgy_Coit
I am one of those hording screenshots of being the only bidder on my plot, and having entrant '0' as the winner - the bug report section does not seem to be setup to report this (and yes, they are aware, in a general way, of the problem).
I have not taken the refund, and am looking for suggestions on my correct course of action in case they are actually able to sort this out in the current cycle (hope springs eternal, but the blackest pit of my soul tells me that I may be consigned to homeless status :( ). -
04-17-2022, 05:52 AMIdowhatIwantHonestly, they would probably keep that some what quiet as it would be a mess to fix the issue. It's a lose-lose situation where it is about impossible to address the problem, and make every one happy at the same time.Quote:
Originally Posted by SapphireWeapon
That should have never been a thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelthor
-
04-17-2022, 05:53 AMJeeqbit"* We will not enter into the next lottery cycle until the investigation is complete and the situation is addressed."Quote:
Originally Posted by Markfresh
-
04-17-2022, 05:54 AMStormpeaksThat is not what that means, the situation is addressed could simply be fixing the issue itself, how are they even going to fix this anyway ? Most people have gotten their gil back (except those who couldnt, due to the OTHER "bug"), they would have to trace those people down, make them pay again so they can claim the house ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeeqbit
-
04-17-2022, 05:54 AMAelin_AshryverI put my bid in prior to maint and won my house.Quote:
Originally Posted by SapphireWeapon
-
04-17-2022, 06:12 AMsagaciousTrace? We put our gil down on said ward of said plot and the numbers and names are recorded all they have to do is email winners and tell them to go and claim the lot or put the money back and claim. I suggest that all zeros made a one and let those 1st comers win the 1st round.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormpeaks