I was just wondering is there is any possibilities to have the Voice 1 and the slight purpleish skin color of the Moonkeeper Miqo'tes back.
I really miss my original Miqo'te design and have been a bit sad ever since ARR removed my favorite Miqote voice nr 1, and my skincolor :(
Skincolor
http://i.imgur.com/R85xisE.jpg
I have found one that is pretty much identical color, but its on the Raen Aura female.
http://i.imgur.com/eRTZKR7.jpg
As for the voice, I found a video on Youtube showing all the emotes with my desired voice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHWT9jFndFw
I really want the voice back as the /laugh was so good
https://youtu.be/v5kEU3MxVow?t=2m56s
PLEASE bring these back :D
1.0 Voice and Skincolor
Printable View
-
02-26-2017, 11:44 PMAltera1.0 Voice and Skincolor
-
02-27-2017, 06:13 AMAltera
Any GMs who could ask the Development Team if this is something that would be feasable?
If not able to bring back the Voice, at least give Miqote Moonkeeper that slight purple skin the Raen Aura F has? :) -
02-27-2017, 06:48 AMTaruna-AeonI made a post like ages ago regarding the 1.0 voices, I kinda feel like my character got a bit stripped of her identity since the voice is no longer an option in the game. So anything like this I support fully.Quote:
Originally Posted by Altera
-
02-27-2017, 06:55 AMPotatoSaladOh my god. I miss that voice. That was my ancient Miqo'te's voice as well. Tabatha Agatha... You WILL be sorely missed, dear.Quote:
Originally Posted by Altera
-
02-27-2017, 07:39 AMClethoria
Maybe it could be a contract thing?
-
02-27-2017, 10:59 AMRukiaFae
Wow 1.0 was gorgeous. Sad I missed it.
-
02-27-2017, 02:19 PMClethoriaDo you perhaps own a NASA space computer? Cause that would be the only way to run it.Quote:
Originally Posted by RukiaFae
-
02-27-2017, 03:37 PMShurrikhanWhy are people repeating this myth so often?... At standard desktop graphics, my fps only improved by some 10% tops going into ARR from 1.x, and greater frequency of doodad-intensive areas often made the open world seem lower fps than 1.x's. If satisfied with a mere 30 fps I could play with better textures than in 1.x than in ARR.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clethoria
-
02-27-2017, 05:03 PMIromi
I miss the way 1.0 looked too ; ;
I know they removed the black skin color also, now it is grey. I love my character now and don't intend to change it at all but I fully support this as well. -
02-27-2017, 06:06 PMSerildaI couldn't leave Limsa in 1.0 on my PC, let alone fight anything, because it was more like 0.5fps for me. My PC is great (still using it today) but has a trash graphics card, like most people who don't game on PC (e.g. the majority of Japanese players). Upgrading my card for a game so universally panned seemed like a bad deal at the time so I missed out on the whole of pre-ARR.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shurrikhan
Purple and black skin would be a welcome return though and that voice sample was cool. -
02-27-2017, 06:17 PMMagic-Mal
Adding a black skin option back? You get an unbiased +1 from me!
-
02-27-2017, 06:25 PMLambdafishhttp://www.siliconera.com/wordpress/...to3_thumb1.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Shurrikhan
No... the game was extremely unoptimised -
02-27-2017, 06:56 PMKathrynYou did NOT need a nasa computer to run 1.0 it really WASN'T that hard to run hell I ran it and STREAMED the game just fine, 1.0 certainly was a beautiful game, but so is 2.0 onwards in it's own way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clethoria
-
02-27-2017, 07:31 PMLuluna
I miss that voice :(
Have to agree the game just looked so much nicer...looking back ARR just lacks that atmosphere Version 1 had. It ran OK for me at the time. -
02-27-2017, 07:39 PMAtreyu
I honestly wish we could just use a color wheel for everything rather than a limited option color palate.
Even if the color-wheel was limited based on race/tribe/what is already available, I am terribly pickiy about color and I often find myself flip-flopping between two different ones because one is too dark, but one step below is too light... or it changes hue slightly or something like that.
This is most apparent (to me) in selecting hair color :l *grumble* -
02-28-2017, 02:30 AMShurrikhanUnoptomized or not, I found little to no FPS increase on my same hard-ware going from 1.0 to ARR under the same settings, and over the transition many of the shaders came to look poorer, characters lower poly, and certain textures poorer resolution.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lambdafish
Any what does that picture have to with anything? IF that example were representative (it is not, as the slide was pointing out examples of badly misplaced development time into awkwardly perfectionist personally dev-crafted items, etc., not optimization), then that just means 1.0 bogged the computer a whole lot less per line of shader code than its replacement ARR. -
02-28-2017, 05:03 AMLambdafishIts not actually the specifics of the picture that are important (though the example is kinda embarressing on the 1.0 devs), rather the entire talk at GDC was Yoshi P talking about how Yoshi P was poorly built and caused problems for a lot of players, and how this would be remedied in 2.0.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shurrikhan
Also, thats not how shaders work, or coding in general for that matter (how much it bogs down the computer per line of code is irrelevant), there is no argument to the benefit of 1.0s graphics functionally, only that it was very pretty. -
02-28-2017, 07:06 AMAnyan
You have my support. I also wish we could get a color wheel but apparently better CC is on the bottom of the list. :(
That music is nice too. I wish they'd add that to the existing ones to change things up a bit. Is it just the video, or my ears playing tricks on me but doesn't the sounds like the footsteps we hear sound better somehow? -
02-28-2017, 07:41 AMShurrikhan*Heh, that typo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lambdafish
I wasn't claiming that more shader codes made... shading... better? in 1.0., only that in general, the way 1.0 did shadows looked prettier to me than the way ARR+ does them (similar story for skin tones, or certain weather effects). (Alternatively, I like the way ARR does glare in desert zones far better than the way 1.x did them, and most of the spell animations had at least some improvement, just in my opinion.)
Nor was I claiming that Crystal Tools was by any means more efficient. I was only pointing out that the allegedly massive disparity between Crystal Tools and Luminous performance within their respective iterations varies between hyperbole and outright myth, and can sometimes feel downright like propaganda.
(Now maybe it's just that one was more GPU vs. CPU intensive, and the limiting component of the two simply swapped, hence the little to no change in performance, but most legacy players I've played with reported the same—minimal fps increases, with similar bogging due primarily to dense geometric shadows, object count, and player count.) -
02-28-2017, 07:49 AMalimdia
I'd trade miqo'te voice 5 for that.
Which one is voice 5? Oh you know, that one, the one that stands out in combat that sounds like a mouse being strangled.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hhPOXv9PFQ -
02-28-2017, 08:01 AMShurrikhanYep... I should not have this many tabs up. Sorry about that, and thank you for the note.Quote:
Originally Posted by alimdia
_______________________________________________
On topic:
I would very much like my original shade of very pale, distinct from the surrounding ARR shades of very pale, and my original voice back. -
02-28-2017, 08:09 AMalimdia
I think you mixed topics, Shurrikhan, that quote is from another thread.
-
02-28-2017, 09:52 AMDamianFataleThe backgrounds look so much more detailed, and I wish that song was the area music again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Altera