Why are there an uneven of servers in each data center?

I noticed Primal has fewer servers than Aether, so I thought why not move 1 of them to Primal, putting both of them at 11 each?
Maybe it would help alleviate server load so we have emergency maintenance less frequently?
And why can't people in the same data center play with anyone outside of it?
Is this a design choice?

Would you prefer balmung or gilgamesh moving to primal?

Neither. I like it the way it is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rin_Sato

And why can't people in the same data center play with anyone outside of it?
Is this a design choice?

---

Yes, that is the entire reason for Data Centers existing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rin_Sato

Would you prefer balmung or gilgamesh moving to primal?

---

All a stupid move like that would do is move the "server load" to Primal Datacenter, only it would be worse than anything Aether currently experiences.

I'd prefer to stay far away from both Gilgamesh and Balmung.

Illuminati and Half Life 3 confirmed.

If you want the Balmung server on your data center be my guess, won't miss it one bit. Too many creepy role players for my liking.

As a player on Balmung with friends on Midgardsormr I do not want those servers moved to another datacenter...


If that happened, I couldn't cross world Party Finder with them!

Aether is a quarantine for Balmung and Gilgamesh, keep it that way.

Don't forget about the mythical Twintania server on primal listed in the launcher lol.

During launch there used to be only one datacenter for NA/EU and one for Japan but we ran out of instances (You would queue with a full party but would have a queue time since there were no available instances) so they spun them off into more data centers which is what we have now. Perhaps then Primal had more players per server than Aether did.

It's more a problem of the weird loopholes of getting into (apparently) full servers by server transferring to them making them overpopulated.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rin_Sato

And why can't people in the same data center play with anyone outside of it?
Is this a design choice?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GMERC

Yes, that is the entire reason for Data Centers existing.

---

Weeeell.... Yes and no. The datacenter split is by design, yes, but not to intentionally to keep players apart per-say. It's more a matter of the implementation of the duty finder and the instance servers.

See, here's the thing... Let's say you have a group of players, whatever size... do the math thing and say that it is a pool of size n. If you have 4 players and you need to choose 4, then it's simple, you have 1 choice. If you have 5 players and need to choose 4... you now have 5 that you can make (order doesn't matter so a number of duplicates can be eliminated). 6 players... 15. 7 players... 35. To bring it to what you're more likely to encounter... 1000 players is 41,417,124,750 possible combinations to make a party of 4 players. For 8-man content the number is even worse. Then you need to make sure that you have the right combination of roles to do the content...

To cut down the time needed to perform the matching, SE needed to split the populations to be chosen from down into manageable chunks. Yes, not all players on all datacenters will be playing at the same time, nor will they be competing to get into the same duties, but even at 100 people the number of combinations is close to 3 million. By pure terms of computing power required to run this algorithm efficiently you wouldn't want to take, say, the several million that are currently subscribed and throw them all into the same pool. You'd never get a party again.

Also, to head this off, yes there is the option of 'first come, first served', but even that runs into the problems of having to find all the people looking for the same content at the same time and formulating a valid party by popping people out of the queue. Still a process that becomes more problematic with the more people you throw into it.

+1 for moving Balmung to their own RP datacenter

By themselves

Forever

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NolLacnala

+1 for moving Balmung to their own RP datacenter

By themselves

Forever

---

And then let all the whining over increased queue times start. Would laugh for ages.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Valkyrie_Lenneth

And then let all the whining over increased queue times start. Would laugh for ages.

---

No, not really.

There are plenty of other people on the datacenter. And Primal gets on just fine without a Balmung-sized server.

now that they have released cross world pf with the express purpose of getting people more options to form groups and statics to clear content, i highly doubt they would move any servers to a different datacenter breaking up groups

I think if SE were going to do this, they'd want to even out population rather than server count. Throwing the high pop servers onto another data center would just be shuffling the problem around unless that data center was significantly less populated, which I doubt Primal is.

I'm thinking the uneven server count probably resulted from them trying to keep data center populations as even as possible at the release of 2.0 and certain servers just expanded way beyond expectation since then, but it would take money and likely upset things too much within the community to just start throwing servers around now.