What i've seen for the good was ruin III potency was increased from 120 to 200. This means tanks better watch out, summoners are even more OP. The bad though is the primal gear, yes it sezy as a healer but personally i believe summoners deserve Bahamut gear. What are your thoughts about 3.2 and the effects it has on summoner ( or anything else)
How 3.2 is good and bad for summoners
Printable View
-
02-24-2016, 09:08 AMPoweHow 3.2 is good and bad for summoners
-
02-24-2016, 09:30 AMMimiluThe Bahumat gear is the Dreadwyrm gear... >w>Quote:
Originally Posted by Powe
-
02-24-2016, 09:36 AMPowe
I mean an exclusive for smn
-
02-24-2016, 09:37 AMSuirieko
To be honest, I really like the Shiva style gear. My only complaint is that the boots aren't actual Stilettos like Shiva's boots are. >_<
-
02-24-2016, 09:45 AMPowe
I love shiva too, makes me a sexy dragon " roar " but smn should be a cool powerful outfit to represent how we can chain gods to our will
-
02-24-2016, 10:05 AMDarkstrideWell, Primals are hardly true gods, and we aren't really "chaining them to our will". We can take a sliver of their essence and turn it into an action figure. I just don't think Summoner is so much more powerful to deserve it's own gear aesthetic...it isn't the only job that has to share primal gear appearances.Quote:
Originally Posted by Powe
In regard to the gear in general, I personally find the overall job alignments with Primal gear a little odd, especially that Dragoon has Garuda all to itself. -
02-26-2016, 08:40 AMWhiteArchmage
Also, the Lore gear isn't SMN-specific, it's for BOTH BLM and SMN, and all the SMN exclusive gear has done a send-up to Bahamut (AF1 with the horn shape and wings, and AF2 with bigger wings). I DO find it odd that DRG has Garuda all to itself, Healer and Caster are recolors of each other and tanks have to share Ifrit with MNK, since we were still missing Ramuh and Titan, so you could have made Ramuh gear for casters, and Titan for Tanks. And that's not even getting into NIN and BRD/MCH sharing Levi...
-
02-26-2016, 08:52 AMRawrzThey broke place macro q.q Thats why its bad D:< (Affects SCH/SMN/ACN)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rawrz
-
02-26-2016, 12:39 PMPowe
Well I dont macro stuff unless its a raise spell or a LB3 sooooooooo
-
02-26-2016, 12:44 PMPoweYea was kinda hoping for Ramuh for caster gear too, though I don't think anyone likes a possible titan gear after the whole weapons made out of rocks thing. Also what do you mean by AF1 and AF2? Are you talking about the i45-i50 and the i200 gear?Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteArchmage
-
02-27-2016, 09:37 PMCarstienBut there is already a bahamut set.Quote:
Originally Posted by Powe
Everybody gets one and what you are asking for is that summoners get the king of dragons as their own personal new glamour or they remove every set bar caster from dreadwyrm and block blm from equipping it.
Seems kinda selfish either way. A -
02-29-2016, 02:27 AMKabzy3.2 buffed Summoners, that is all. Your gear not looking like a Dragon has zero effect on anything, glamours exist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Powe
-
02-29-2016, 09:58 PMLeigaonThat's actually what I came here to ask. I wanted to know more about the actual damage dealing part of the job if it has changed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kabzy
Seems to me like Ruin III has a more common place in my rotation. Would look like that a Ruin III is like pushing out 3 Ruins at once. Lots of MP at once but if you can manage it....
I guess I will play with it some.