New healer outfit and the missing bow?

On the new healer gear for WHM there is a cute lil red bow in the back {i have not got the top just yet but soon} anyway iv noticed that only the female gender seem to get it? but if that's true why don't female lalas? here are some pics :( https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-a...exer_Photo.jpg https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...1e&oe=56369BC4 https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...2f&oe=5678BC46 I was thinking at first maybe since the tails? but then Male kitty catsdon't get em as well so? anyway i really like the bow and it be nice to see it on my lala

Can confirm my female Au-Ra has the bow.

http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/m...015_044240.png

Miqo'te females seem to always have a bow at the base of the tail even when the other races don't.

I am not sure about this particular item as I have not looked, but my assumption is only my race will have it (again)
Do Au'Ra females have the bow? Since they have a tail... I wonder ^^

edit: As above it looks like its a tail thing ^^

It's for tails. Would look weird just having a bow on your butt.

What about female humans? ty guys for the info:D

Quote:

---

It's for tails. Would look weird just having a bow on your butt.

---

It's not act on the butt :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Walluh

It's for tails. Would look weird just having a bow on your butt.

---

Get On your Knees?

Fem miqo and au ra have tailbows.

Happens on a LOT of armor.

Sigh, btw, why the new WHM (AF2) body has the classical attached cap removed!!!
I think this cap is the signature of WHM as same as the "cone shape red stripes"!

I doubt this was the result of many ppl complaining the cap overlap with the hair/weapon at the back ^^;

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nicobo

Sigh, btw, why the new WHM (AF2) body has the classical attached cap removed!!!
I think this cap is the signature of WHM as same as the "cone shape red stripes"!

I doubt this was the result of many ppl complaining the cap overlap with the hair/weapon at the back ^^;

---

far more people would complain if this set took up 2 places (head and chest) because you wouldn't be able to glamor it. (and imo people really do want to glamor the head piece)

but on topic. if they were going to take the time to make the tail areas on female costumes a little different why not make actual tail holes? rather than letting the tails just clip though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Everdark

far more people would complain if this set took up 2 places (head and chest) because you wouldn't be able to glamor it. (and imo people really do want to glamor the head piece)

but on topic. if they were going to take the time to make the tail areas on female costumes a little different why not make actual tail holes? rather than letting the tails just clip though.

---

Because there'd still be clipping with movement.

The tails aren't solid objects either.

In the case of the super fluffy type, it's a cross shaped set of "billboards", that appear to look 3D when you look at it but if you look at the tip and straight down, you can see its an + shape.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nadirah

Fem miqo and au ra have tailbows.

Happens on a LOT of armor.

---

I think you mean not enough armor.

TAIL BOWS ON EVERYTHING 2015.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Everdark

if they were going to take the time to make the tail areas on female costumes a little different why not make actual tail holes? rather than letting the tails just clip though.

---

Another good question is why female characters with tails get this consideration, which isn't perfect, but at least HELPS, whereas males with tails just have to live with the ugly clipping. And why they put nice cut-outs on some older sets of armor, but then designed the male Miqo'te tails to clip two inches to the left of them every single time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Selli

I think you mean not enough armor.

TAIL BOWS ON EVERYTHING 2015.

---

Gods no.

It looks horribly out of place on a lot of things.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lukha

Another good question is why female characters with tails get this consideration, which isn't perfect, but at least HELPS, whereas males with tails just have to live with the ugly clipping. And why they put nice cut-outs on some older sets of armor, but then designed the male Miqo'te tails to clip two inches to the left of them every single time.

---

I act agree with this mean if it's just toons with tails why is it only females? why not males as well :P but really whatever just wanted cute bow for my lala^^

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Everdark

far more people would complain if this set took up 2 places (head and chest) because you wouldn't be able to glamor it. (and imo people really do want to glamor the head piece)....

---

I mean the cap attached on the cloth(WHM AF1 body), it is the design of the body, there is another head gear for this AF set.

http://ffxiv.gamerescape.com/w/image...hiteMageAF.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nicobo

I mean the cap attached on the cloth(WHM AF1 body), it is the design of the body, there is another head gear for this AF set.

http://ffxiv.gamerescape.com/w/image...hiteMageAF.jpg

---

When i first started this game and got my WHM AF set the first thing i did was to try and lookup what /command would make me flip the hood up. I was very sad when i discovered i couldnt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nicobo

I mean the cap attached on the cloth(WHM AF1 body), it is the design of the body, there is another head gear for this AF set.

http://ffxiv.gamerescape.com/w/image...hiteMageAF.jpg

---

sorry ... I thought you meant this ...
http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/umadori07...6daf9b34-s.jpg

it just looks awful on anything not a Lalafell or female hyur @_@(the head piece ... I can live with the rest even if I wish the under shirt actually looked like a shirt and not a piece of cardboard). but I agree with you... simply being able to filp that hood on or off would be wonderful

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nicobo

I mean the cap attached on the cloth(WHM AF1 body), it is the design of the body, there is another head gear for this AF set.

http://ffxiv.gamerescape.com/w/image...hiteMageAF.jpg

---

Probably cause it makes it utterly impossible to have long hair with that style of armor.
It's an absolute clipping nightmare.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Everdark

sorry ... I thought you meant this ...
http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/umadori07...6daf9b34-s.jpg

it just looks awful on anything not a Lalafell or female hyur @_@(the head piece ... I can live with the rest even if I wish the under shirt actually looked like a shirt and not a piece of cardboard). but I agree with you... simply being able to filp that hood on or off would be wonderful

---

It looks terrible on female Hyur as well =/
Weird nun/pope hat. Why couldn't it just be the hood without the weird skullcap? It'd be really nice if it weren't for that bit =/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nicobo

Sigh, btw, why the new WHM (AF2) body has the classical attached cap removed!!!
I think this cap is the signature of WHM as same as the "cone shape red stripes"!

---

Because it would look silly if people had a robe with a pulled-back hood attached AND the headgear that went with it that WAS a hood. With AF1 they went with attached hood and a tiara. With AF2 they went with a pulled-up hood as headgear *shrugs* Sure, the hood doesn't have the 'classical' look, but if they went with the 'classical' design every time, they'd only hear that they were being too repetitive with designs.