Support this post for the next Live Letter

Terabyt3 posted a question about WAR imbalance in the mod created thread "Ask Your Questions for Letter from the Producer LIVE Part IX!". It's the first reply. Give it a like so that the developers give it more attention.

http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...97#post1373397

Terabyte, would you mind adding something about our craptastic cd's?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Terabyt3

Although you have already been asked about Warrior during the TGS and gave an answer that more research had to be done by the community new information has come to light.
Warriors main form of mitigation (Self healing) is static and does not scale with incoming damage.
Paladins main form of mitigation is % based so scales according to incoming damage.
Warriors shine when the incoming damage (dps) is below or close to their mitigation (self healing).
However Titan and Coil both have way higher DPS and this is showing the obvious difference between scaling and static mitigation. So long as static mitigation is present for warrior this will always be the case.
Are the development team aware of this and do you have any plans to have WAR get a form of scaling mitigation comparable to PLD (Not increased parry rate though. My idea was increased potency on self healing reflecting the damage incoming so that the self healing done is ALWAYS comparable to the ammount blocked by a PLD. The more damage coming your way the more your storms path, IB and bloodbath heal you for. Bloodbath, Thrill of battle and IB need to be comparable to PLD's % mitigation from his cool downs combined. Storms path need to be comparable to block. A war will self heal more the more damage he's taking and the more damage he's putting out. Real defiance!)?

---

Click on the little blue arrow next to his name in the quote to go to the post

bumpage, for great justice

bump nice post

Interested to know too. Bump

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by takenokonosato

http://jp.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodest...8/blog/267630/
http://jp.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodest...8/blog/267988/
http://jp.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodest...8/blog/268412/


上記はNAフォーラムに書き込まれた内容を翻訳してくれた有志の記事ですが、こういった詳細な計算結果が出て、
実際のユーザーの声としてもNA、JP共に戦士改善要望のトピックがHotTopicsになっている訳ですが、
これらの状況を受けてもなおまだ吉田Pは「戦士は研究を重ねれば最強（候補）である」と言えますか？
言えるのであればその論拠をお願いします

---

http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/threads/101657

JP Question regarding the same issue. Like his post too to support this. 3rd question down.

Supported both.

I will support these posts

We need WAR to get attention more... PLDs clone with HDL and Curtana is everywhere these days lol

Bumpage x 2, for greater justice

As a PLD, i fully support them addressing the issues regarding mitigation/self-healing/proper scaling/etc. with the Warrior job. My brother mains a WAR as well. I want to compete for my spot on a team, not be selected b/c of the job i decided to play. Hoping these issues get addressed.

Bump. Warriors need to get the attention they deserve. I wouldn't say we're as nerfed as most think(I have yet to reach even AK) but we are definitely not on par with Paladin. Our CDs can't even compare.

bump, bump-bump

Bumpity bump

bump a million times

bump and like gogogo

Bump and Voted

Do I have to like his idea however? I don't like it.
I like a post pointing out a difference but scaling heals on damage doesn't compute to me. Why go that route? Also why do White mages not have this issue. There heals don't scale based on enemy damage, they're based on their stats with more value based on the effective healing a Tank has on them.

Bump

/10char

Bumped and voted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hundred

Do I have to like his idea however? I don't like it.
I like a post pointing out a difference but scaling heals on damage doesn't compute to me. Why go that route? Also why do White mages not have this issue. There heals don't scale based on enemy damage, they're based on their stats with more value based on the effective healing a Tank has on them.

---

i agree, scaling heals in this manner would be troublesome to do, coding wise, and could lead to exploiting in some circumstances.

however a level 50 trait that turns all the less-than-100% heals (bloodbath, storms path) into 100% heals, with a 200% return with a critical, wouldnt be as exploitable in lower level content and address some of the mitigation issues. (would be nice to have the stun put on to the GCD instead of 30 seconds but the mitigation/healing needs more attention right now!)

FFS, grow a pair and just level PLD. It takes like 2 days.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hundred

Do I have to like his idea however? I don't like it.
I like a post pointing out a difference but scaling heals on damage doesn't compute to me. Why go that route? Also why do White mages not have this issue. There heals don't scale based on enemy damage, they're based on their stats with more value based on the effective healing a Tank has on them.

---

It's a scaling thing.

An attack does 1000 damage.

A paladin soaks 50% of it (BS numbers, but just adding the 20% from shield oath and assuming both have equal mitigation otherwise)

Takes 500 damage.

A warriors soaks 30% of it.

Takes 700 damage.

The warrior can heal that 700 with IB (Again bs numbers.), the paladin is just cured in one shot. They're equal.

Now increase that.

Attack does 10000 damage

Paladin soaks 50% -- 5000 damage to be healed.

WArrior soaks 30 -- 7000 to be healed -- minus the 700 from IB -- which didn't go up because the fight got harder. WHM has to heal 6300 -- 13% more.

This is the issue, warriors mitigation is supposed to be damage soaked + what they heal -- but the heals don't go up as the difficulty of the fight does, so their effective mitigation -decreases- as the fights get harder.

Meanwhile paladins mitigation is just straight "soak as much as possible" -- which actively scales with incoming damage.

BY ripping the blood dk effect -- % of damage taken, lets say, 20% of the damage taken in the past 5 seconds is added to IB.

Same attack

PAladin still takes 5000.

Warrior takes 7000, heals 2100 (700 from IB, + 20% of 7000 or 1400.) now they've "Effectively taken" 4900, which means the WHM has to heal 4900, putting them on par with the paladin, while making their mitgation still thematic and reactive via heals as they're designed to be.

Warriors aren't gimped because they take more damage, they're gimped because the tools they're given to make up the extra damage they take, don't scale up with the amount of damage they're taking, while the paladins straight mitigation, does.

-------

Finally, to answer your question, WHMS don't have this issue, because it's the interplay between the roles. Tanks gain more mitigation/hp with gear, meaning they take less damage, which allows healing to scale smoothly. But since warrior healing IS their mitigation, and it doesn't scale as fast as damage does, there is a big gap between the healing needed for a paladin adn the healing needed for a warrior, leaving a lot of WHM's trying to cover the gap their gear doesn't let them

bump bump bump

I haven't done coil yet, but I absolutely have had no problem tanking and killing HM Titan.

I feel like a lot of the complaints are from inexperienced healers, under geared tanks, or a combination of the two.

Additionally, you don't really stress your healers out in this fight like people believe. Everyone tries to calculate math into it, but frankly, not only are heals more effective on you when casted, your health pool allows much less over healing (and thus less agro as every point of HP over healed is one point of agro on the healer).

Paladins simply can't boast this. I run with my FC of Real life friends and we run both a Pally and Warrior for the fight. They regard the opinion as misinformed inadequacies that are sketchy in theory and fail in practicality and I'm inclined to believe them. Especially when most of these calculations are done with an entire ilevel of gear missing, based on presumptions and flawed ideas on how stats actually work (we havent figured it out yet), and thus rely on conclusions that are missing important details or aspects that we as players are not even aware about.

Again, I haven't tanked coil, so I don't know about that. Yet, as far as tanking HM titan, we have absolutely no problems nor do good healers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wonka11

I haven't done coil yet, but I absolutely have had no problem tanking and killing HM Titan.

I feel like a lot of the complaints are from inexperienced healers, under geared tanks, or a combination of the two.

Additionally, you don't really stress your healers out in this fight like people believe. Everyone tries to calculate math into it, but frankly, not only are heals more effective on you when casted, your health pool allows much less over healing (and thus less agro as every point of HP over healed is one point of agro on the healer).

Paladins simply can't boast this. I run with my FC of Real life friends and we run both a Pally and Warrior for the fight. They regard the opinion as misinformed inadequacies that are sketchy in theory and fail in practicality and I'm inclined to believe them. Especially when most of these calculations are done with an entire ilevel of gear missing, based on presumptions and flawed ideas on how stats actually work (we havent figured it out yet), and thus rely on conclusions that are missing important details or aspects that we as players are not even aware about.

Again, I haven't tanked coil, so I don't know about that. Yet, as far as tanking HM titan, we have absolutely no problems nor do good healers.

---

But if you get the i80 gear supposedly from Crystal tower you will not have a problem doing coil either. The issue is pld when all is optimal has better overall defenses. People tend to blow it out of proportion when saying WAR is useless. The fact that pld skills scale only becomes an issue when the instance out levels the gear ratio. So it would become harder on the whm. So people gravite towards the easier to be more "efficient" and that boils down to "Level PLD NOOB" as so well demonstrated in this very thread.

Well there ya go then, Paladin is simply overpowered and warrior is fine. My advice to other warriors is that they should probably be happy with the situation. We are in no position to be nerfed and are designed to be exactly at par with the game.
Paladin will most likely see a nerf due to its capability to tank 1-2 fights beyond the gear iLevel gap. For the players crying "Paladins can tank stuff that we're not supposed to tank currently, so I should be able to as well!" seems stupid to me, and flawed logically on premise when taking into account the state of the game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wonka11

I run with my FC of Real life friends and we run both a Pally and Warrior for the fight. They regard the opinion as misinformed inadequacies that are sketchy in theory and fail in practicality and I'm inclined to believe them.

---

Caduceus would like to have a word with your FC buddies. I saw him wielding one of these:

http://lumberjocks.com/assets/pictur...cts/390547.jpg