Whoever designed Forked Tower should be fired

Yeah.
Savage in the middle of casual content, no way of knowing when the door will be open until 30min before, limited to 3 ressurections per run, mechs that if one person does wrong it kills everybody.

Ridiculous. Deplorable. Unacceptable.

...I think I don't even need to explain anymore, we all are familiar with this disaster of a dungeon this is.

I think they should fire whoever keep insisting on raise restrictions in general honestly, it's tired

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brandr

Yeah.
Savage in the middle of casual content, no way of knowing when the door will be open until 30min before, limited to 3 ressurections per run, mechs that if one person does wrong it kills everybody.

Ridiculous. Deplorable. Unacceptable.

...I think I don't even need to explain anymore, we all are familiar with this disaster of a dungeon this is.

---

In a crowded field of bad decisions throughout DT, I'd agree this one really took the cake.

Fired is taking it too far. It was a good idea but it was implemented the wrong way. What should be done when creating any kind of content is dicuss what is good about it, what can go wrong with it and how can we improve the player experience. That comes down to having different perspectives involved and challenging each other. This can bring to light different aspects that a developer may have missed when implementing a new idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by melbye

I think they should fire whoever keep insisting on raise restrictions in general honestly, it's tired

---

Raise restrictions in content are fine but the problem is we already have a punishment mechanic through weakness. Two death punishment mechanics is just annoying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LuciaGreene

Fired is taking it too far. It was a good idea but it was implemented the wrong way. What should be done when creating any kind of content is dicuss what is good about it, what can go wrong with it and how can we improve the player experience. That comes down to having different perspectives involved and challenging each other. This can bring to light different aspects that a developer may have missed when implementing a new idea.

---

You're right...
Can we have at least a public apology?

Yeah, if they fix FT in a way that makes it fun to the majority, it would be enough.

FT itself is fine, but it should've been queue-directly only.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 0blivion

FT itself is fine, but it should've been queue-directly only.

---

Exactly. And not raise restrictions.

I wished it would be a casual content available in duty-finder.
But this design is just bad. :(
And why are there still no adjustments/fixes after more than two months? :confused:

I just feel like they made it so tough so we waste so much time so they can figure out what they are doing for the next expanision but that's just me
It not being a duty qu thing when the population goes from high to low on weird times and on certain centers... so you know you have to be in discord for this matter.
I loved Bozja it didn't feel forced on you having to use discord cause call outs and other things plus it wasn't so crazy (yes it was but I didn't see this festival of chaos with it and no one even does Fork on my centers anymore now)