Originally Posted by
Shurrikhan
Demi-Ultima: ...Why? Why would you add a spell with so many restrictions? Such only reduces the possible nuances of the spell and, at the effective potency you've set here, would makes all else of the job feel like mere prologue to Ultima per Ether or Convert CD (each spender phase of which will end up painfully identical).
Absolute Zero: No effects are random. It will be either 2 seconds or 3. If you want to extend debuffs, make it 3, since all DoTs operate on a per-3-second tick rate. Regardless, allowing for a 3-second AoE stun on a DPS is, at this point (or really any point since HW) very, very strange. Moreover, you've not given a cooldown for this ability, meaning that Absolute Zero + a GCD- or sub-GCD-casttime Ice spell would allow it to extend Trick Attack and Chain Stratagem infinitely. It likely still wouldn't be worth the damage it'd cost the BLM itself, but even the idea that it may do so could oblige BLMs to forfeit their actual rotations in favor of going full-time buff-extending Ice Mages. This is a horrible idea.
Ultima: You do not want to attach such massive and iconic sources of damage to RNG. You've here fettered both BLM's most powerful spell and its second-most powerful to low proc rates, meaning that they more than likely will not see this spell even go off in a majority of dungeon boss fights, for instance. Allowing it to work off Sharpcast, however, would be little better, as it'd essentially kill what little decision making remains to that ability, as it'd absolutely have to spent on Xenoglossy alone. Any why have you made this oGCD? BLM has never had oGCD attacks. Ever. Only buffs. That's been core to its identity, even. And even if you make this the newest, coolest tactical nuke, that needs to do more than merely displace its current ones, else you're effectively just chopping off two main points of interest (Zeno and Foul) to replace them with a far slower, far more restrictive singular point. The latter is not a positive change. Additions are not necessarily additive; ones like this are instead more likely to be disruptive, or even destructive.