Originally Posted by
Bonbori
I don't believe it's a problem widespread enough to warrant such a huge feature to be created just for it. It's also not within SE's sphere of responsibility or even ability to compensate for players' mismanagement of resources, trust and security.
I feel that the game already provides a lot of tools to prevent such incidents. FCs have the ability to set permissions for company chest access, roster management, house management and other administrative functions. Responsible leadership would share those very sparingly, only with trusted people, preferably as few as possible, and only on a temporary basis when there's a good reason to.
And players themselves can avoid getting hacked by: not participating in RMT, not falling for phishing scams, using the authentication app, not hooking up one's account to any third party services, not sharing login information with anyone ever under any circumstances, the list goes on and all of it is common sense.
Of course, there are also cases of "hacking" and there isn't a reliable universal way of detecting whether someone is a prospective thief... but if a person like that somehow acquired enough trust to be granted access to the FC funds, a banking system wouldn't stop them either. What with the keys that the FC leader voluntarily handed them over in the first place.
So I guess the moral of the story is... An FC leader who delegates too many administrative functions compromises their FC's security, and the responsibility for any potential breach lies mostly on them.