Quote:
Network: AS1299 - Telia Carrier
Router: Frankfurt (ffm-b1)
Command: traceroute 195.82.50.9 as-number-lookup
traceroute to 195.82.50.9 (195.82.50.9), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 kddi-ic-319844-ffm-b1.c.telia.net (62.115.32.106) 6.903 ms 10.091 ms 0.552 ms
2 * * *
3 * * *
Network: AS1299 - Telia Carrier
Router: Frankfurt (ffm-b1)
Command: traceroute 204.2.229.9 as-number-lookup
traceroute to 204.2.229.9 (204.2.229.9), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 ffm-bb4-link.telia.net (62.115.116.159) 1.474 ms 1.544 ms 0.964 ms
2 ffm-b4-link.telia.net (62.115.120.6) 0.885 ms 1.641 ms 0.854 ms
3 ntt-ic-323130-ffm-b4.c.telia.net (62.115.147.65) 1.092 ms 1.194 ms 1.376 ms
4 ae-24.r24.frnkge08.de.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.217) [AS 2914] 1.209 ms 2.809 ms 2.145 ms
5 ae-5.r24.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.12) [AS 2914] 14.162 ms 17.167 ms 15.243 ms
6 ae-5.r24.nycmny01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.18) [AS 2914] 83.096 ms 90.859 ms 81.186 ms
7 ae-4.r22.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.13) [AS 2914] 154.194 ms 148.285 ms 148.635 ms
8 ae-0.r23.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.6.30) [AS 2914] 151.471 ms 147.519 ms 151.867 ms
9 ae-3.r23.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.124) [AS 2914] 167.793 ms 171.093 ms 166.894 ms
10 ae-41.r02.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.6.119) [AS 2914] 168.769 ms ae-45.r01.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.175) [AS 2914] 157.264 ms ae-41.r02.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.6.119) [AS 2914] 162.350 ms
11 ae-3.r00.scrmca02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.7.11) [AS 2914] 162.666 ms 170.922 ms 168.723 ms
12 xe-0-1-0-1-1.r00.scrmca02.us.ce.gin.ntt.net (129.250.195.46) [AS 2914] 169.103 ms 176.595 ms 167.467 ms
13 204.2.229.234 (204.2.229.234) [AS 2914] 168.645 ms * 174.753 ms
14 * * *
15 * * *
Quote:
0ms start
88ms, received NYC players movement packets
155ms received JP players movement packets
176ms, received NYC players movement packets
197ms received UK players movement packets
200ms ACK
288ms received NYC players movement packets
355ms received JP players movement packets
376ms, received NYC players movement packets
397ms received UK players movement packets
400ms ACK
488ms received NYC players movement packets
500ms transmitted movement positions to NYC,JP and UK
555ms received JP players movement packets
576ms, received NYC players movement packets
597ms received UK players movement packets
600ms ACK
688ms received NYC players movement packets
755ms received JP players movement packets
776ms, received NYC players movement packets
797ms received UK players movement packets
800ms ACK
888ms received NYC players movement packets
955ms received JP players movement packets
976ms, received NYC players movement packets
997ms received UK players movement packets
1000ms ACK, transmitted movement positions to NYC,JP and UK
You'll note that for the sake of making things look sane, I put ACK on 200ms boundaries with the assumption that Nagle is on. It results in the NYC players getting only one extra command ACK.
Quote:
0ms start
88ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
155ms, received JP players movement packets,ACK
176ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
197ms, received UK players movement packets,ACK
264ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
310ms, received JP players movement packets,ACK
352ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
394ms, received UK players movement packets,ACK
440ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
465ms, received JP players movement packets,ACK
500ms, transmitted movement positions to NYC,JP and UK
528ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
591ms ,received UK players movement packets,ACK
616ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
620ms, received JP players movement packets,ACK
704ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
775ms, received JP players movement packets,ACK
788ms, received UK players movement packets,ACK
792ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
880ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
930ms, received JP players movement packets,ACK
968ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
985ms, received UK players movement packets,ACK
1000ms, transmitted movement positions to NYC,JP and UK
1056ms, received NYC players movement packets,ACK
1085ms, received JP players movement packets,ACK
1182ms, received UK players movement packets,ACK
So what's wrong with above? The NYC players have essentially double the movement resolution as the Japan and UK players. The JP and EU players will always be behind. Take note of the 500ms transmission ACK, the the NYC players get to send 5 movement commands in the same time space the Japan players get to send 3 and the UK players only get 2. After the first movement update, then the NYC players get 6 movement commands, the JP players get 3, and the UK get 3.