Poll: Would you still PVP OFTEN if there was no XP?

Please respond with a simple yes or no answer.

Would you PVP more than one match every day or two if you got zero XP from it.

I expect a couple people might even say yes. :rolleyes:

Nope.

Can't even be bothered to do it with the nerfed xp, much less removed.

having exp in pvp didn't ruin it, pvp always and bots/afk'ers/ win trading.

only way to "fix it" is remove all rewards, but then no one would do it at all. People don't want to play something and get 0 reward.

Just to add my vote, I would definitely not bother with pvp if there was no XP in it. Maybe MAYBE once in a blue moon if I was really bored, and that's assuming I didn't have to wait more than 5 minutes in a queue..

Yes. I don't pvp for exp or any of the pve rewards. I do it for the feast rankings (of this season I've been lazy).

Yes. I had over 1000 matches played before they added xp. Now it is just infested with bots and people who don't try so I don't pvp much anymore.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ToniRomo

Yes. I had over 1000 matches played before they added xp. Now it is just infested with bots and people who don't try so I don't pvp much anymore.

---

how is it just now? it was always like this lol.

Yes. Exp didn't ruin it, people do (and their afkers, bots).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BigRed5392

how is it just now? it was always like this lol.

---

No. I have average 200-300 matches per month (7-10 matches/day). Compare that to the bots 1000+ on September.
Granted it takes 1-2h for queue to pop but before SB was still fun even on 24 (8v8v8). Now it felt more like 2 vs 22, amplified on 72.

Yes I would.

I pvp for garo stuff and light farming. xp is easier to get in levelling dungeons and roulettes