i110 Sets for Glamour

Greetings!
I would like to put versions of glamour (for all) of the other sets of craft i110 (as already put the Uraeus Coat)

After a long time taking and editing screenshots achieve superimpose i110 clothes in other classes

Arachne Scouting Set in AST.
http://imgur.com/IbYBJTC.png

Arachne Shirt of Scouting with other pieces of healer.
http://imgur.com/eTRZmKI.png

Arachne Casting Set in DRK.
http://imgur.com/HNXwQVA.png

Arachne Bolero with other pieces of tank.
http://imgur.com/SIgGDNG.png

Arachne Healing Set in BRD.
http://imgur.com/zRN08Bc.png

Arachne Robe with other pieces of brd/mch.
http://imgur.com/RUC5mkD.png

Wootz Fending Set in BLM.
http://imgur.com/6s3eCtk.png

Wootz Cuirass with other pieces of caster.
http://imgur.com/T661alg.png

We need a little more freedom?, what do you think?

Unfortunately, SE have specifically said they don't want to do this as it will destroy the image classes and Jobs have (like, mages wearing robes and tanks in heavy armour, and especially the 'traditional' appearence of Jobs like a WHM wearing a white robe with red triangles etc - specifically it's to prevent one using another's AF). Gary Gygax's shadow lingers in some respects (the idea of 'mages only being able to wear light clothes and robes and heavy melee classes only wearing heavy armour is a trope that Gary Gygax created for Dungeons and Dragons and thus it's continued to linger in RPG design long after it made the jump into the electronic medium).

So I don't see changing this (I have to agree with them, I think a mage wearing tank gear looks stupid, it's an image thing. Plus, if a mage could wear heavy armour then what is the point of having a tank to defend them? No, the glamour restriction will most likely be staying I'm afraid).

Then why are so many tanks in underwear (example: Coeurl Beach Briefs) out there?, or because the Legacy Warrior Set for all classes if it is also an armor?

It should not be fairer for everyone? :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Enkidoh

Unfortunately, SE have specifically said they don't want to do this as it will destroy the image classes and Jobs have

---

This is the most ridiculous excuse ever. You can run around in a bikini or a snowman or any other number of ridiculous outfits. There is not a single stupid outfit in the OP's costumes. We need more freedom in how we dress our characters - not less.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Enkidoh

Unfortunately, SE have specifically said they don't want to do this as it will destroy the image classes and Jobs have

---

There are already a lot of light outfits that can be worn by everyone though.

Not heavy armors though. I think the heaviest looking glamour around is the Legendary Warrior Set? So I doubt we'll see a glamour version of the Wootz/Titanium Set.
Glamour versions of the Arachne Sets though seem totally possible. And I for one would love 'em. Sure you can already wear the Casting set as a Monk, but increasing the variety would certainly be most welcome.

Agree with op.

The very second they introduced things bathing suits, reindeer suit, chocobo suit, valentine costumes, moogle suits..maid outfits, nightgown attire, npc specific outfit for all ..etc the "image" of ANY class is removed completely and instantly....A LOT more so with those outfits then what the op is suggesting.

Their excuse holds no weight and no longer makes any sense imo
I am all for these introduced outfits..the more the better!!

It no longer is logical to not allow the changes ,when there are so many outfits that do exactly what they claim to be preventing lol
Glamour freedom, 100% would only aid enjoyment.