People are saying 2.0 hunts are more worthwhile than 3.0 hunts and also that there is too much of a grind on relic. Solution to both is in the title of this thread.
Printable View
People are saying 2.0 hunts are more worthwhile than 3.0 hunts and also that there is too much of a grind on relic. Solution to both is in the title of this thread.
SE did not want to advantage the more experienced people for the relic grind. Since those who have been hard at it since 3.1 will practically be swimming in Centurios since all their armor/acc are 210 already. I think if they were to include centurios, they should also include old Primal tokens all the way up to Ravex.
I have 3 level 60 battle classes and I hardly used centurio to do upgrades, I got the pink gear from diadem, also there is void ark dropping a weekly item to get upgrade gear. most people will use it on relic not twines even if they have a 200 set, if they had that option of course.
Seems to me it would be nice if they added Allied Seals to the HW hunts. I know lots prefer the old school hunts because of relic. Personally I have too many roles leveled so I use my centurio's for upgrades. I would love it the HW hunts dropped both.
Well after hunting sobmuch for my relic, I have enough clan logs to upgrade a couple eso when they finally release gobdip.
Regardless of whether or not players that have been playing since the 3.1 patch may have a gear advantage while people now may theoretically have to choose between eso upgrades and relic mats, one can't simply ignore the idea that pre-HW hunts are now seen as much more valuable than post-HW. And that is incredibly backwards.
Although if the former is a potential issue, this could be solved by making post-HW hunts drop allied seals too.
Because they needed to keep 2.0 more relevant than 3.0 hunts for some reason.