Estate Sharing an inactive work around?

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-10-2015, 04:42 AM
Thorium

Estate Sharing an inactive work around?

I FARTED! WOOPS!
11-10-2015, 04:43 AM
Limecat

There was already a mention in the notes that only the owner of the house counts, not shared people.
11-10-2015, 04:45 AM
Thorium

Quote:

Originally Posted by Limecat

There was already a mention in the notes that only the owner of the house counts, not shared people.

Ah ok must have missed that bit. Thanks for clearing that up i was just wondering is all.
11-10-2015, 04:51 AM
SendohJin

directly from the notes

Quote:

Halting Demolition
Any free company member or private housing owner entering the estate at any time prior to demolition will cancel the demolition process.
* A tenant entering a shared estate will not cancel the demolition process.
11-10-2015, 05:16 AM
TouchandFeel

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thorium

I FARTED! WOOPS!

I was wondering what that smell was ...
11-10-2015, 05:37 AM
Voltyblast

A tenant entering a shared estate will not cancel the demolition process? Then what the heck was the point of sharing a house? It could've been a nice thing to at least allow the others to reset the counter, but not even that? I fail to see a point of this sharing estate feature...except for the sake of sharing, I guess.

I'm just ranting at this point....
11-10-2015, 05:50 AM
Lexia

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voltyblast

A tenant entering a shared estate will not cancel the demolition process? Then what the heck was the point of sharing a house? It could've been a nice thing to at least allow the others to reset the counter, but not even that? I fail to see a point of this sharing estate feature...except for the sake of sharing, I guess.

I'm just ranting at this point....

You hear that sound? Yes the room mate feature is for the sole purpose of sharing house with others.
11-10-2015, 05:52 AM
Krokov

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voltyblast

A tenant entering a shared estate will not cancel the demolition process? Then what the heck was the point of sharing a house? It could've been a nice thing to at least allow the others to reset the counter, but not even that? I fail to see a point of this sharing estate feature...except for the sake of sharing, I guess.

I'm just ranting at this point....

No you make a good point. Why not have shared tenants reset the demolition though so I can see why they did it because then you could just have shared tenant and you would never have a fear of losing your house or property as long as there was at least one tenant visiting it. It just sucks that they force the owners in essence visit their properties if they don't want to lose them.
11-10-2015, 05:54 AM
Anova

So your husband can own the house. But if he ever dies, you and your kid don't have any rights to inherit his property. Great.

Yes, it's a game. Still sucks for the cities to treat adventurers like 3rd class citizens though. I'm half-convinced it's just some money scheme to fund the wars and adventurer guilds.
11-10-2015, 05:57 AM
Lexia

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anova

So your husband can own the house. But if he ever dies, you and your kid don't have any rights to inherit his property. Great.

Yes, it's a game. Still sucks for the cities to treat adventurers like 3rd class citizens though. I'm half-convinced it's just some money scheme to fund the wars and adventurer guilds.

You can just log onto their account sell the house to your character... oops I'm being insensitive there, my bad.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page