New healer outfit and the missing bow?

On the new healer gear for WHM there is a cute lil red bow in the back {i have not got the top just yet but soon} anyway iv noticed that only the female gender seem to get it? but if that's true why don't female lalas? here are some pics :( https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-a...exer_Photo.jpg https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...1e&oe=56369BC4 https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...2f&oe=5678BC46 I was thinking at first maybe since the tails? but then Male kitty catsdon't get em as well so? anyway i really like the bow and it be nice to see it on my lala

Can confirm my female Au-Ra has the bow.

http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/m...015_044240.png

Miqo'te females seem to always have a bow at the base of the tail even when the other races don't.

I am not sure about this particular item as I have not looked, but my assumption is only my race will have it (again)
Do Au'Ra females have the bow? Since they have a tail... I wonder ^^

edit: As above it looks like its a tail thing ^^

It's for tails. Would look weird just having a bow on your butt.

What about female humans? ty guys for the info:D

Quote:

---

It's for tails. Would look weird just having a bow on your butt.

---

It's not act on the butt :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Walluh

It's for tails. Would look weird just having a bow on your butt.

---

Get On your Knees?

Fem miqo and au ra have tailbows.

Happens on a LOT of armor.

Sigh, btw, why the new WHM (AF2) body has the classical attached cap removed!!!
I think this cap is the signature of WHM as same as the "cone shape red stripes"!

I doubt this was the result of many ppl complaining the cap overlap with the hair/weapon at the back ^^;

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nicobo

Sigh, btw, why the new WHM (AF2) body has the classical attached cap removed!!!
I think this cap is the signature of WHM as same as the "cone shape red stripes"!

I doubt this was the result of many ppl complaining the cap overlap with the hair/weapon at the back ^^;

---

far more people would complain if this set took up 2 places (head and chest) because you wouldn't be able to glamor it. (and imo people really do want to glamor the head piece)

but on topic. if they were going to take the time to make the tail areas on female costumes a little different why not make actual tail holes? rather than letting the tails just clip though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Everdark

far more people would complain if this set took up 2 places (head and chest) because you wouldn't be able to glamor it. (and imo people really do want to glamor the head piece)

but on topic. if they were going to take the time to make the tail areas on female costumes a little different why not make actual tail holes? rather than letting the tails just clip though.

---

Because there'd still be clipping with movement.

The tails aren't solid objects either.

In the case of the super fluffy type, it's a cross shaped set of "billboards", that appear to look 3D when you look at it but if you look at the tip and straight down, you can see its an + shape.