Let us "Challenge Party" to Wolve's Den for No Reward

Simple Solution to Dueling that's non-intrusive.

1) Duel Requests can only be made in a certain outdoor area of Wolve's Den Zone (not by vendors)... Party Leader to Party Leader (or Solo to Solo).

2) Any Party Composition or Size is allowed (1v1, 2v2, 3v3, 4v4, 5v5, 6v6, 7v7, 8v8).

Hey look, now we can duel for fun in an instanced environment which doesn't break the experience/immersion for others.

And we don't care if it's perfectly balanced for 1v1 or any other Party Composition or Size.

This Feature is intended for FUN & not to be taken very seriously with regards to Balance.

i'm cool with that! Add an option to spectate! :P

They said not a while ago there will never be a 1 vs 1, if they make something would be a 8 vs 8. besides of that 2vs2 or a 3 vs 3 would be an endless Fight till a melee get a lb or something.(unless you play against nubs), so not point for a 2 vs 2 or 3 vs 3

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Maxwell

i'm cool with that! Add an option to spectate! :P

---

Now that would be cool. Honestly, it would be nice if there was an arena or something where you could spectate fights. Spectating Frontlines would be cool too... but it would probably be too difficult to implement without causing too many additional problems.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cero0

They said not a while ago there will never be a 1 vs 1, if they make something would be a 8 vs 8. besides of that 2vs2 or a 3 vs 3 would be an endless Fight till a melee get a lb or something.(unless you play against nubs), so not point for a 2 vs 2 or 3 vs 3

---

It would be fine if they actually allowed the rewards for pvp to make sense. People in pvp sets with pvp tuned stats should, in theory, completely steamroll people in pve gear, but they don't. SE Killed the customization that would have made all the difference.

I disagree fights would go on forever, though. Even in the original wolves den, it was pretty easy to neutralize healers, and skill levels (even among veteran players) made a huge difference. Besides, there's always ways to avoid endless matches. Ie. Healers get sudden death, for example.

If you are a good healer you wont have a problem trying to handle 3 ppl tbh,you would only die after a long fight or a LB. But yeah that depends on ppl if they know what to do.Even in secure or slaughter was not hard to halde a party trying to kill you, Even in seal rock against premades( in this case is hard if have like 3 smn on you lol).

I can tell you in a 2 vs 2 i would never die unless they melee LB me in the right moment.I wouldnt mind a 4 vs 4 duel thought and maybe a 3 vs 3 atleast would be fun to watch and if you can spectate

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cero0

If you are a good healer you wont have a problem trying to handle 3 ppl tbh,you would only die after a long fight or a LB. But yeah that depends on ppl if they know what to do.Even in secure or slaughter was not hard to halde a party trying to kill you, Even in seal rock against premades( in this case is hard if have like 3 smn on you lol).

I can tell you in a 2 vs 2 i would never die unless they melee LB me in the right moment.I wouldnt mind a 4 vs 4 duel thought and maybe a 3 vs 3 atleast would be fun to watch and if you can spectate

---

Oh, I know what you mean, killing healers can be horrifically difficult, and it is utterly demoralizing to get one down to 10% only to have them suddenly shoot back up to 100 in one second flat. I especially find Sch and Astro to be a problem these days, for some reason.

That being said, I used to roll as a PLD in Frontlines, and I can tell you now that no healer is good enough to survive a gank when they have been stun locked, followed by a pacification, and a 20% vulnerability increase. The only way you're getting out of that is if you have a second healer saving your butt, otherwise, it's game over. I used to see it a lot, but, again, those teams knew what they were doing.

This' a legit solution to allowing duels...