I had fun weave/double weave my OH SO AMAZING mit when the other could do the same with less effort
https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/e7/c7/nYcSNPtc_t.jpg
Printable View
I had fun weave/double weave my OH SO AMAZING mit when the other could do the same with less effort
https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/e7/c7/nYcSNPtc_t.jpg
https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/56/44/KFz6bBwj_t.jpg
10% of physical mit and 30s away from being a clone. That is what it is.
What if we make TBN a 10% mit less and 15s recast Bloodwhetting? can't it be called a clone? Ah the polishing turd dogma run so deep.
Did you like accidentally delete the rampart button off your DRK hotbar and then decide that the lack of rampart on your bars must mean that DRK never had rampart because I’m honestly concerned
Is it so hard to answer that you have to make another question instead?
Shall we make TBN a 10% mit less and 15s recast Bloodwhetting to see if it can be called a clone?
It's getting increasingly more nonsensical.
What's next? Are we going to compare Oblation with Vengeance to prove Oblation is a bad ability?
You... you didn't actually say anything about living dead by the way. You described what you wanted done with it. You just went on some childish tirade and used lots of caps.
Here are your words:
That makes an invuln, almost by definition, holmgang. It would just have a longer cooldown.
Why? both of them aren't even have the same recast time...
Oh wait, didn't we just compared ToB will TBN the other day? the nonsensical has already begun.
Then what do you want it to be? A holmgang clone? Thal's balls man actually finish your thoughts. You only said what you wanted taken away, not anything else. Even in your fanfiction dark knight thread (because square is never going to listen to fan remakes so I don't spend time reading them) you kept the heal. So which is it?