if anything the 'random speculation' were the attempts to justify why they 'might be in 2.0' in spite of how obviously slim the chances were
so
-
10-19-2012, 04:56 AMfusional
-
10-19-2012, 05:09 AMEliseusRandom speculation = random speculation no matter how you want to "justify" itQuote:
Originally Posted by fusional
so
You know how many people speculated that primal weapons wouldn't be in 2.0 when most signs showed how "obviously slim the chances were" just to have a community rep say they would still be in 2.0?
so
stop speculating. -
10-19-2012, 05:12 AMShougunQuote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus
Nothing was random about it. -
10-19-2012, 05:14 AMEliseusRandom was intended as random people that don't know what they are saying.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shougun
It was also towards the people that tried going out of their way to tell people how dumb the pretty much are for wanting to know if they were going to still be obtainable in 2.0.
I do know I'm glad to know now, I'll probably start working on them. -
10-19-2012, 05:17 AMShougunPeople knew what they were saying, it was speculation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus
The problem is that some people claim speculation as fact, that is the only problem about this. -
10-19-2012, 05:18 AMfusionalno, but i sure know equivocating when i see itQuote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus
-
10-19-2012, 05:21 AMEliseuscool?Quote:
Originally Posted by fusional
/10char -
10-19-2012, 12:30 PMMoiren
:<
/10chARR -
10-19-2012, 01:24 PMNefGPThat's perfectly fine, we understand you guys are busy - it can just get a little frustrating at times ^^;Quote:
Originally Posted by Bayohne
Thank you for the clarification. Now to continue smashing my head against the wall as I try to win this damned fight. -
10-19-2012, 02:17 PMDzian
Flicking through the last posts i wasn't aware they were considered "seasonal" but it seems a lot of people weren't.
but we have clarification so at least people have there answer :)