Can we toggle off questionable glamour?

You’re talking to the wind my friend

OP is the type of person who calls the cops when they see couples holding hands in public

Sorry, but no, I don't support this. Aside from the fact that what is questionable to one player may not be questionable to another. At the end of the day, this defeats the purpose of the glamour system.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Igneous

You’re talking to the wind my friend

OP is the type of person who calls the cops when they see couples holding hands in public

---

How about hugging? Do we have to remove the /hug emote as well?

Except that all these outfits are almost the same (which is boring in my opinion), I don't see any problems. I don't understand why some people are so eager to control someone else's appearance.

I want to express myself, and I want that expression to be visible to all. Putting my aesthetic on display is of the utmost importance, even if it includes my ass hanging out sometimes.

I either want my character's appearance to accurately reflect what kind of player I am, or to do the complete opposite for comedic effect.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taybat

Why do people keep asking this? I wonder what kind of lives they live if they are offended by how people dress? I live in a big city. People wear all sorts of things and It never bothers me. Go to a gay club or something, get a life

---

To be fair, its mostly one or two people asking for it over and over again. Then everyone else saying no. Then them making a new post awhile later.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MsQi

I'm not a fan of the 2B butt, but the devs put it in the game, so what are you gonna do?

1. Did you make this image? Cause you spent a lot of time looking at what you consider not ok if you did.
2. What exactly is not ok with it? How is this 18+? Cite examples please.
3. What's your problem with the third person in the center row and the first on the last row?

---

Curiously this list only consists with skimpy ensembles that make perfect sense together. I see color coordination and cohesion... There's no "ridiculous frog suit" or "immersion breaking cook with 2h sword". So despite what they stated in the OP, the insatisfaction seems pointed towards a very specific thing.

edit: Didn't realize this is a new thread, but yeah still holds my point since it's the same person

Posting in a troll thread babyyy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Raikai

Curiously this list only consists with skimpy ensembles that make perfect sense together. I see color coordination and cohesion... There's no "ridiculous frog suit" or "immersion breaking cook with 2h sword". So despite what they stated in the OP, the insatisfaction seems pointed towards a very specific thing.

edit: Didn't realize this is a new thread, but yeah still holds my point since it's the same person

---

Well, it clearly has nothing to do with "immersion breaking," and everything to do with censoring any notion of sexual expression of others in their outfit choices. Their goal would be to get their way, not to be intellectually honest, so expect manipulation tactics that such people think would be effective. Wanting such an option developed for the game is really just a veiled attempt to force one's own preferences onto others at the expense of equal expressive options. They want others to be discouraged from doing what they want at the risk of their outfit not being correctly represented to other players if they dare use clothes they don't like. Such people will choose self-serving authoritarianism over freedom & tolerance every time the opportunity presents itself to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Raikai

Curiously this list only consists with skimpy ensembles that make perfect sense together. I see color coordination and cohesion... There's no "ridiculous frog suit" or "immersion breaking cook with 2h sword". So despite what they stated in the OP, the insatisfaction seems pointed towards a very specific thing.

edit: Didn't realize this is a new thread, but yeah still holds my point since it's the same person

---

Well he's pretending to be upset about skimpy glams in general, and the 2B bottoms in particular. But, he's trolling so he actually doesn't give a crap and is just trying to get a rise out of people. I was just trying to see if he would construct an actual argument. I'm wondering if a certain streamer is behind some of this trolling.