The point of the analogy was lost the moment you decided to say 'this isn't a job', not it's not a job - but we each play a role as people do in the workforce when we are in an instance.
I can respect someone who's lazy. They are not a mutually exclusive thing, as you would try to have people believe -
Dictionary.com's definition of lazy.
la·zy
adjective
1.averse or disinclined to work, activity, or exertion; indolent.
2.causing idleness or indolence: a hot, lazy afternoon.
As you can see, the word in and of itself is not actually a bad thing. You're not wanting to work harder than you have to, you're choosing to be idle, etc. There's nothing wrong with that - it's your own personal playstyle. As I said, I'm happy I'm not relying on you for my healing - because I believe in pushing my class to the absolute limit.
Actually, my very first post, I listed off a number of circumstances where you wouldn't want to deal damage. As I've said, it's a case-by-case situation, and purely up to healer comfort. I believe you're misinterpreting the meaning of my posts, and this is ultimately causing you to feel more insulted than you really should.
I merely said you're lazy if you choose not to damage when you are capable of doing damage to maximize your downtime. I.E., the tank's holding hate and regen's keeping him topped off - which happens in more of my parties than the bad DPS/tanks you mention. I know it's easy to Dogpile on bad tanks/dps,but I tend to find they all perform rather well. Perhaps it's my own good fortune.
My appologies if you feel personally attacked. That is not my goal. But really, you want everyone in the party doing the best they can do - because otherwise, runs take longer, whipes might happen, etc. No one enjoys sitting through whipes or taking 60+ minuts to clear an AK.
