I'm just going by what's on a wikipedia page for Sweet Baby inc (probs more trustworthy than outrage bait articles and videos). That's about all the research I genuinely care to put into this nonsense "controversy."
Printable View
I'm just going by what's on a wikipedia page for Sweet Baby inc (probs more trustworthy than outrage bait articles and videos). That's about all the research I genuinely care to put into this nonsense "controversy."
Once again, maybe you anti-woke people can make a new thread to complain about diversity and do your conspiracy theory stuff elsewhere.
You've already taken this already terrible thread well off the rails.
As how riveting (its not) this SBI and GG2 talk is - people should probably realize that if Grummz is one of your vocal leaders of the movement, its most likely a grift.
On Wuk Lamat's voice, its serviceable but not my cup of tea. The VA has hot and cold moments where the cold are freezing and the hot lock in the role well; I would like to see more in DT to see if it is an issue of first time the role or if something more that needs to be reviewed (the characterization for Wuk Lamat coming off immediately more comedic takes me a bit too much out of them being a serious plot moving character.).
Here's your evidence of Kabrutus disavowing doxing and harassement.
https://i.ibb.co/7KfZ3vL/Clipboard01.png
Everyone can edit wikipedia, it is not more trustworthy. Literally you can look up the timeline, and I even showed you the timeline. It just does not match up with what you are saying.
It's still 300k members, though. Disavow or not, you know how the saying goes: "one bad apple spoils the bunch."
https://i.imgur.com/Z7587Cc.png
the wiki page is only a month and a half old. plus Wikipedia can be easily manipulated
100% agree with this.
It's a stupid saying. Just lets people tarnish a whole group by using a few bad actors. (adding this on to save on posts.)
GG2 and the SBI outrage's biggest hurdle is going to be how the big voices are the usual people who we would associate with grifting, which kind of sucks probably for the curator - because he probably has a good intention in mind thats going to get milked by people looking for clout and a buck.
At the end of the day, its going to be really interesting how certain games are going to get narrative shifted because SBI was associated with them in some fashion.
I think the issue with this whole SBI is that you are going have to convince people that AC:Valhalla, GoW:R, Alan Wake 2, and Spiderman 2 (tangently also including Wolverine here) are bad games because of """""wokeness"""""
I think the Steam curator's first thing is going to have to do that when some of these are very well sold games and what people would consider great games (maybe not Valhalla, but it sold well and is celebrated).
EDIT: Ill include Dota Underlords to the list as well.