[Feedback] Wuk Lamat's English Voice

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mosha

care to elaborate more?

---

Fear mongering over "woke", saying the woke are "coming for your kids".


Harassing people over perceived DEI issues (just look at the Baltimore bridge thing lmao)

Making lists of companies to boycott over "wokeism"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Valkyrie_Lenneth

Fear mongering over "woke", saying the woke are "coming for your kids".


Harassing people over perceived DEI issues (just look at the Baltimore bridge thing lmao)

Making lists of companies to boycott over "wokeism"

---

So you comparing dumb people on the internet to organised groups within industry often with government funding?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mosha

So you comparing dumb people on the internet to organised groups within industry often with government funding?

---

No, I'm comparing them with political entities with funding trying to push a narrative to win elections

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Valkyrie_Lenneth

Fear mongering over "woke", saying the woke are "coming for your kids".


Harassing people over perceived DEI issues (just look at the Baltimore bridge thing lmao)

Making lists of companies to boycott over "wokeism"

---

I mean, if people don't want to spend their hard earned cash on games that have been DEI altered games, that should be our right. And if we want to inform other people about it, there shouldn't be anything wrong with it.
After all, if you're a fan of it. You can use that very same list as a recommendation list for your next purchase. I see nothing wrong there.

But Sweet Baby Inc the company themselves, literally went out of their way to start a harassment campaign against the person who started the curator list that did exactly that. Nothing more, nothing less.

Saying "But bla bla did much worse!" is all nice and well, and possibly true? But I doubt anyone of us in here are involved in that. And is a case completely separated from this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Valkyrie_Lenneth

No, I'm comparing them with political entities with funding trying to push a narrative to win elections

---

Wuff, now who's sounding conspiratorial? I mean I'll happily listen if you got evidence for that. This stuff is bad from either side. But... a bit far fetched from the topic at hand.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Valkyrie_Lenneth

No, I'm comparing them with political entities with funding trying to push a narrative to win elections

---

So now we have a rather vague "muh culture war" narrative rather than I don't like how SBI conducts itself to get what it wants.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mosha

So are you ok with SBI harassing and trying to get people banned for merely documenting projects they've had involvement with? let alone using fear tactics on game devs to get what they want?

---

I mean if you retaliate by harassing and doxxing employees, then I think the ban is warranted/justified.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nestama

I mean if you retaliate by harassing and doxxing employees, then I think the ban is warranted/justified.

---

Do you have evidence of the owner of the Steam group doing that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nestama

I mean if you retaliate by harassing and doxxing employees, then I think the ban is warranted/justified.

---

Now who's pushing propaganda here buddy? You keep repeating this fake narrative that it started at some completely unrelated forum at some other far end corner of the internet. Whilst clearly there was little to no fuzz going on until they Literally started a hate campaign urging people to ban the curator group and it's creator. How can you justify this Blatant vindictiveness?

Because the creator of the curator group has in no way participated in that. He has been trying hard to keep the forums clean, and even removed the forums all together to save the curator list itself.
How can you say he's doing harassing and doxing, when he's public disavowed and discouraged anyone from doing that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nestama

I mean if you retaliate by harassing and doxxing employees, then I think the ban is warranted/justified.

---

They doxxed themselves since their info was all public and nobody harassed them, they were just merely globally ridiculed for their actions and got what they deserved for acting the way they did.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ZiraZ

They doxxed themselves since their info was all public and nobody harassed them, they were just merely globally ridiculed for their actions and got what they deserved for acting the way they did.

---

Absolutely this!

These people keep conflating harassment with 'replies that disagree with us.' Or 'saying things we don't like.'