Whats in 1.23a..?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Punainen

Why don't you just wait for patch notes like the rest of us?

---

I'm not a Waiter, I'm a Weaver!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ricky

Welp, looks like I was correct in every way possible!

http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/threads/51545


It even says "this is not required to advance the main story" which means you did in fact kill all of those guys I mentioned in the GC quests

Also, it's spelled you're

---

Quote:

---

This battle content presents some contradictions when played alongside the main story, as events following the battles are the same as those experienced during the quest "To Kill a Raven.

---

This is just to for Van Darnus, does it say how it contradicts Ifrit or Garuda, I know Van Darnus got killed, I said I killed him. Ifrit and Garuda however didn't get killed after easy mode. This is why they have my quoted disclamer, so we don't troll that we killed Van Darnus, but we can still fight him.

Also resorting to being a Grammar Nazi wow, just wow, you ideas hold no weight after that grammar nazi attack.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Delsus

This is just to for Van Darnus, does it say how it contradicts Ifrit or Garuda, I know Van Darnus got killed, I said I killed him. Ifrit and Garuda however didn't get killed after easy mode. This is why they have my quoted disclamer, so we don't troll that we killed Van Darnus, but we can still fight him.

Also resorting to being a Grammar Nazi wow, just wow, you ideas hold no weight after that grammar nazi attack.

---

Alternate Ending, I'm assuming. This new one is probably canon for 2.0

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Delsus

Edit: I bet the community reps, and Yoshi love seeing us speculate like this.

---

No doubt. I know if roles were reversed i'd be entertained, and sometimes amazed and impressed, by the imginative things we come up with.

And then slightly disgrunteled when we rage about it.

And then content when we go do it.

ANd then ignore it when we rage about it anyway....

...They probably stopped reading long ago ^^

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rau

Alternate Ending, I'm assuming. This new one is probably canon for 2.0

---

[/quote]events following the battles are the same as those experienced during the quest "To Kill a Raven.[/quote]

This says it all, that's why they said there is a contradiction in the story

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Risae

Vidyagaemes

---

Fixed .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shosasosa

Thats not how i remember most patches. almost every patch ive seen the release the patch notes a few hours (and in some cases days) ahead of the patch. and theres always 2 posts ont he lodestone. the initial patch notes (the early ones) and the final patch notes that happen when the servers go down or shortly after.

---

From what I've seen, patch notes are always put up after the servers go down but before they go back up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Delsus

events following the battles are the same as those experienced during the quest "To Kill a Raven.

This says it all, that's why they said there is a contradiction in the story

---

Who said? When? Where?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Punainen

Who said? When? Where?

---

On the patch notes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Furukawa

On the patch notes.

---

Oh, well that's not an alternate ending. Its contradictory 'cause they'll be all 'yey you just killed Darnus!' when you already did it before.