That's technically not true but I don't really wanna type up math
(1. bias is a property of an estimator and not the distribution or the data.
2. Moments of the data converge to that of the normal distribution under some regularity conditions; the most common use is that the mean converges with very mild assumptions. The distribution (empirical CDF) does not. See https://stats.stackexchange.com/ques...-clt-statement for more details).)
If there's a discrepancy between critic and user reviews, like TLOU2, it's because critics have different tastes than regular gamers. So really it's probably better to find a few reviewers who align with your tastes and follow them than to look at review aggregators.
Also the way a lot of professional critics engage with the medium (not just games but movies etc.) is very different from the regular joe. They look at cinematography, look at innovations in acting, etc. Not necessarily what the regular joe cares about when playing. TLOU was groundbreaking in storytelling methods in video games. But many don't care that dialogues in TLOU are acted in a more natural way (such as characters interrupting each other which is rare in other video games back in 2013). GoW PS4 used a single camera through the entirety of the game which is technologically and cinematographically impressive. But do people really care? This is what a critic would notice and care about. People might want to find Youtube critics that they agree with and stick to them because honestly otherwise you're just reading people with really different tastes judging the game.
