what was your benchmark compatibility score?

DX9 = 6764
DX11 = 6306

System
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.150316-1654)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3225 CPU @ 3.30GHz
8138.594MB
AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series (VRAM 1006 MB) 8.17.0010.1191


A little weaker on the DX11 one, but as long as I'm over 5k I'm good to go!

7222 DX11, 1920x1280 Max Settings (with one or two High/Very High adjustments because I didn't notice a graphical difference but saw a performance increase). Love the DX11 improvements!!!!!!!

Windows Home Premium 64-bit
Intel Core i5 750 @ 2.67Ghz
8183 MB
NVIDIA GeForce 760 (VRAM 1990MB)
1920x1280 Full Screen

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LunaSnowfield

Okay this must be a **** joke

System expect :

I7 4790k 4.0 Ghz
Evga GTX 980 SC
SSD Samsung PRO 850 256GB.
Asus Maximus Ranger VII
Drivers updated.

And im getting between 55-57 fps with 7k score? meanwhile some people with a Celeron D and a GT 5200 are getting over 80 fps on 1080p...

http://i.imgur.com/pl1kdKD.png

---

There is something VERRRRY wrong with that FPS graph. It looks like the GPU keeps being throttled. It should either be unbounded (eg vsync off) or one straight line if it it's hitting vsync. Everyone else, who gets higher numbers has peaks-and-valleys, not seismograph-shaped graphs.

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 16477 Extremely High
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Full Screen
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Livin the good life

http://i.imgur.com/560KtJd.png

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=1&theater

7752 GTX G80

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Senliten

DX9
http://i.imgur.com/wcLCfWm.png


DX11
http://i.imgur.com/ahvMBIO.png

Annnnd for shticks and figgles. DX9 (5760x1080)
http://i.imgur.com/JmIlztg.png


Why no DX11 of that you ask? Well cause Benchmark no play nice with eyefinity under DX11 settings it seems. <_<
Curious to see if anyone else is running into that issue as well.

---

which gpu?

CPU: i7 930 3GHz
GPU: GTX 670 (VRAM 2GB)

2560x1440 MAXIMUM Borderless Full Screen DX11
SCORE: 4329 High

Is this the expected score with my setup? Please advise

Forgot the score, but everything on max I only got high >.>, not sure what to upgrade.

CPU: i5-2500k
GPU: Nvidia GTX 275

On high desktop settings at 1920x1080 I got Fairly High, which I believe was mid-3000s. I'll do it again later and post a picture. But considering my graphics card (I had a GTX 570 but it died) I'm not too surprised. I plan on picking up a GTX 970 or maybe a 980 if the price drops later on.

Lucky score, i win!

http://i.imgur.com/pTN6EPf.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GungnirNova

Lucky score, i win!

http://i.imgur.com/pTN6EPf.png

---

are your scores sli or single? direct x 11 with d9 settings?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kyomagi

which gpu?

---

Two R9-290's
And least I say <_< OEM variants *sulks*
Ram wise is 16GB in case you also ask that.

Seems like most of you are running benchmark at 1920x1080 reso.

Need more scores of 2560x1440 max settings!

I scored 5997 on 2560x1440 max settings border-less windowed DX11

Time to retire the R9 290 for a GTX980 which my FC mate gets 8k+ on the same settings as mine.

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 8825 Extremely High
1280x720 Maximum DirectX11 Windowed
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

I really need to by a new monitor .-.

http://i186.photobucket.com/albums/x...psvdlje4bf.jpg

i7 3930k @ 4.5GHz, 3 GTX 780's with a minor overclock. Time to upgrade soon.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Tested on: 4/27/2015 8:04:19 PM
Score: 20152
Average Frame Rate: 168.830
Performance: Extremely High
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: High (Desktop)
Total Loading Time 16.135 sec

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kyomagi

are your scores sli or single? direct x 11 with d9 settings?

---

Single and DX11, just wanted to post the lucky score :p. I usually play the game borderless windowed, and this is the result of borderless windowed.

http://i.imgur.com/fSAVkFC.png

My scores was a bit low (on a different PC atm, but 3500~ish) with max settings. Not sure what I'd want to turn down though. I'll probably upgrade instead because what was more troubling than the score were the periodic super noticeable dips in the frame rate. That was with a still respectable (I think) i7 2600k and a mediocre/ terrible GTX560Ti (purchased to run version 1.0 -- though it didn't really do a great job of that).

Ok DX11 First.

http://i.imgur.com/vfmhUXt.png

And DX9

http://i.imgur.com/nORoGZb.png

Cpu @ 4.35

http://i.imgur.com/A5QycNA.png

I feel like this should be higher.

Does anyone know if this looks right or should it be higher?

Does anyone one know how to get this game to recoginize CrossFire?

I have a amd 7990 and this benchmark only accesses one of the gpu's which made me get a 6281

Score: 6281
Average Frame Rate: 48.980
Performance: Very High
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Borderless Windowed

DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Maximum

System
Windows 8.1 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9600.winblue_r9.150322-1500)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4930K CPU @ 3.40GHz
16300.945MB
AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (VRAM 3072 MB) 8.17.0010.1315

GTX 980 SLI @ 4k, DX11, Max settings

http://rs1366.pbsrc.com/albums/r768/...1e.jpg~320x480

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Virgal

http://i.imgur.com/v3eOS6c.png

---

thats crazy, we have the same GPU, but i use an i5 instead of an i7, and i scored 5400 on Maximum at that resolution =/ CPU makes a huge diff on this benchmark it seems

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nanaho

thats crazy, we have the same GPU, but i use an i5 instead of an i7, and i scored 5400 on Maximum at that resolution =/ CPU makes a huge diff on this benchmark it seems

---

That's a 5930K- http://ark.intel.com/products/82931/...up-to-3_70-GHz, which is a socket 2011 processor with 6 cores, 12 threads.
The i7-4930K has 6 cores and 12 threads on socket 2011. All other i7/i5 parts are Socket 1150 or 1155 and the i5 only differs by not having hyperthreading.
The difference between the socket 2011 and socket 1150 parts is the number of PCIe lanes they have. Virgal stated he's running two R9 295's. So this is the optimal way to run it.

I play on ps4 but just for shits n giggles i tested the benchmark on my laptop in dx11

1027 Low

lolololol

Mine was like over 8000 is all I remember, got a very high score to say the least. :)

I got 3696 on DX9 but barley broke 2000 on DX11.

Safe to say even my dinosaur of a PC can run this game with top specs. (On DX9 any way)

If that's what my PC can do then my PS4 is going to rock these graphics.

This is what I mean when I say "lag"...

http://i.imgur.com/MGfveXp.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/oaAMT4w.jpg

http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/...psl51gmgw4.png

With running in DirectX 9, my score came to 8322. However, I experienced significant load time changes, from ~40 seconds total to 70 seconds. DirectX11 also ran a lot smoother in some locations. No complaints though for a 5yr old mobo and CPU. My GPU helps pick up the slack.

http://i.imgur.com/nDIOgk7.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hours

This is what I mean when I say "lag"...

http://i.imgur.com/MGfveXp.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/oaAMT4w.jpg

---

Well, I was wondering if the character reactions changed on that screen based on the performance rating. Apparently it does! It would be interesting to see them all.

712!!

...and that is why I play on ps4.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hours

This is what I mean when I say "lag"...

http://i.imgur.com/MGfveXp.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/oaAMT4w.jpg

---

hmm, for giggles I'm going to run it on the iGPU...

http://puu.sh/htElP/57789bcaa6.jpg

and for completeness, here's the "standard desktop" dx11 on the iGPU
http://puu.sh/htENn/364fd4fc2e.jpg

No sane person would actually play any game on the iGPU, but this is the trash that "bargain" laptops and desktops come with.

8100-something for me on DX11 with max DX9 settings. Which suits me just fine. Max DX11 settings came in somewhere in the high 4000s.

http://imageshack.com/a/img912/8903/K12yLI.jpg

That isn't too disappointing given how old the pc is :cool:

A10-6800K Richland APU
4 GBs of Memory
Power Cooler Radeon HD 6970
*All Catalyst settings maxed
http://s11.postimg.org/ybyyoogoj/High2.png

Is there a reason I am getting in the 7,000 range with two gtx 980 in sli and a 4.0ghz cpu when running at 1920x1080 dx11 on max? That seems low compared to people with similar set ups. It is a new computer that I only use for gaming so it shouldn't have anything slowing it down.

Edit:

I guess it was getting bogged down by my three monitor set up even though it was still playing in 1920x1080. I got 17,000 when I disabled nvidia surround completely and reran it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shamo_Lomenzo

http://i.imgur.com/A5QycNA.png

I feel like this should be higher.

Does anyone know if this looks right or should it be higher?

---

I feel like your system should do a lil better, maybe tweak the settings a bit or run it at 900p to get it up to very/extremely high. No matter what tho you should be able to run the game fine.

Dunno if 7000+ is good or not but it says Extremely High.
Don't know why, there were some massive dips.
PC is not even a year old and I thought I had some good parts :c
http://i.imgur.com/K83yoJk.png
And yeah, my TV screen has terrible resolution

I haven't done the benchmark, because I'm getting a "new" PC in a couple of days... but I'm getting a little worried right now.

I'm buying my bro's old PC (i5 3570k(4,2 GHz), Radeon 7950(1100/1400)), and while I know it's not the best PC out there, I've seen worse cards here getting pretty good scores... But all those have been Nvidia.

Is FFXIV really that much better on Nvidia cards? or is it just the benchmark? Cause it seems like they get like 50% more performance or something...

If it was a Nvidia card equivalent of a the 7950, I would probably get good enough score to run the game at high settings smoothly, but now I'm not so sure. :(