What Pet Classes Would You Like To See

Puppetmaster, please.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mijin

Tbh the only reason I didn't like Pupetmaster was because:
#1 It's noncanonical as it was new to the FF series in an official sense.
#2 I didn't like the look of it's AF.
#3 When the expansion first launched, and for several updates PUP was really, really bad. I do acknowledge the fact that it may not be the case anymore because I haven't played since '09.

---

well at least i think beastmaster was MUCH more bad than a puppetmaster. a BST did not more than charming mobs from time to time till the charm was broken.. sending mob against mob to fight each other, and then do the rest on your own.

in my opinion pupp was much more well rounded than beastmaster was ever.. and BST has been horrible for PTs because of the inconstant charming system and low dmg/ullities.

Just throw in pokemon master, and let us catch them all!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Madrox

Just throw in pokemon master, and let us catch them all!

---

that'd be beastmaster ;D well.. kind of ;D

i mean thats kind of pokemon type, isnt it ;D :

http://monsters.ffxi-atlas.com/images/left_img.gif

they will be in 2.0.^

Ok first off let's get this straight seriously ><.
Summoner- Is a class that call UPON HIGHER BEING TO ASSIST HIM IN BATTLE. The topic says pet class I read half of ur ideas and it would ruin the summoner name. Really? get elements like monks? How is that a summoner? Cast for only 30 seconds then do element combo? How is that a summoner lol?

To put it down I want summoner some what like XI but a little improvement and not making SMN a WHM. After all SMN is PVE after all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tonkra

well at least i think beastmaster was MUCH more bad than a puppetmaster. a BST did not more than charming mobs from time to time till the charm was broken.. sending mob against mob to fight each other, and then do the rest on your own.

in my opinion pupp was much more well rounded than beastmaster was ever.. and BST has been horrible for PTs because of the inconstant charming system and low dmg/ullities.

---

Well that doesn't mean they need to make BST suck in XIV too. I like the idea of someone who can control wild beasts better than someone who plays with puppets XD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Madrox

Just throw in pokemon master, and let us catch them all!

---

I was going to say! Id like them to rip off pokemon and let us catch and level monsters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tricksy

I was going to say! Id like them to rip off pokemon and let us catch and level monsters.

---

Wow is getting pokemon so might as well right?

I'd love to see them bring a legit necromancer to the series. I don't want to here the same response that it doesn't belong in this series or it's usually the "villain" role. They introduce new jobs/classes in so many of the later games, what would make XIV any different?

I could totally see the summons as ghouls and what not. Even the skeles in the game. And the necromancer summons can help do different debuffs on the mobs. Also give them the poison spit the zombie mages do xD

Just something dark in this already dark game would be awesome.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mijin

Well that doesn't mean they need to make BST suck in XIV too. I like the idea of someone who can control wild beasts better than someone who plays with puppets XD

---

well but he was talking about "puppetmaster being a bad job" ... that doesnt mean also that puppetmaster has to suck in Final Fantasy XIV. and it would be easy to just integrate pupp as a second job choice for puglist.

well find them awesome, cute little puppets ^ and we can see some standing in Ul'dah already..