Originally Posted by
Zebraoracle
Can you blame him when what you're saying is so disingenuous to the point of insulting?
Meanwhile miqo'tes are a dime a dozen and all look the same.
Meanwhile female au ra are a dime a dozen and all look the same.
Meanwhile male au ra range from somewhat decent to uncanny valley akward.
Meanwhile male roes look physically awkward.
Meanwhile elezen have held a monopoly on the Scion membership and all look awkward even when looking good.
Meanwhile male hyur all look the same.
Meanwhile lalafels all look the same.
Oh wait, this is all opinion (other than elezen monopolizing Scion membership) and shouldn't even affect which NPCs we get, which should instead be based on other things, such as "rate of usage".
"I personally hold the opinion that hroths are ugly, therefore I think the race should not receive any story benefits that actually have weight behind them, despite it diversifying the currently stale formula and making hrothgar fans feel like they're getting *something*."
This is basically what the "I don't want a hrothgar MSQ member" arguments in this thread are boiling down to. Cool, thanks for showing we shouldn't bother trying to have discussion with any of you regarding this, especially when you think player limitations really matter when it comes to affecting an NPC's appearance.