Some people here are a bit misinformed. First, there is no such thing as a "law of averages." I'm just going to quote Wikipedia here, because it says it best:
What you're trying to talk about is the law of large numbers (LLN), which states that the average of the results obtained from a large number of trials will be close to the expected value, and will tend to become closer as more trials are performed.Quote:
As invoked in everyday life, the "law" usually reflects wishful thinking or a poor understanding of statistics rather than any mathematical principle. While there is a real theorem that a random variable will reflect its underlying probability over a very large sample, the law of averages typically assumes that unnatural short-term "balance" must occur.
Now, as for the OP, what are you even trying to propose here? You've complained quite a lot these past few pages, but really offered no alternative solution. What you SEEM to be advocating is a pseudo-random system in which the game will increase the odds of you obtaining a mini-Cactpot with a possible 1-2-3 on the board each time you do not receive one.
