Originally Posted by
DevonEllwood
I've seen the Buddhist approach before and I feel I need to comment on it. I was in a borderline Christian school and I once asked someone, a very Christian person, why mean people exist. She said " If mean people didn't exist, then how would you know the nice people are actually nice?". Christianity states that suffering is inevitable just like so many other religions and beliefs in the world. It's not unique to Buddhism and it's not a novel concept. Isn't Buddhism suppose to reject all pleasures and desires, including closeness with others because they're why suffering exists? We literally defeat a giant space chicken with the power of friendship. Isn't Nirvana the end of suffering? Or is there something I'm not understanding?
Religions have various statements on suffering and they can boil down it's going to happen in life. Get used to it. Some of them have some kind of "end" to suffering in some form or another. Suffering can be argued as being one of the main reasons religion exists to begin with. People suffer and they want to know why, so they come up with something.
It's not like Japan is not know for using western religions in their media anyway. Seeing Endwalker as a thrown from paradise story as people have already explained isn't seeing it through a "western lens". It's literally what it is.
Also if this thread is re-made, can the first post please incorporate more of the different complaints with Endwalker?
This just reminds me just how stupid the story is. And it doesn't include the moon being a spaceship.