Gamescom 2.0 Article thread

Just read there's going to be a 25th FF anniversary in the US too on Sep 1st at PAX, not just Japan.

I'd expect a bit about beta and relaunch to come out of Tokyo and Seattle that day.

Well, I hope it will.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chrees

Good news! Looks like they've changed their mind regarding current players and the ARR beta.

---

:D :D :D Most exciting news I've read all day!

Nova_Crystallis will be done her Article soon look forward to that as well! :D.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hycinthus

I feel that GW2 will disappoint because it's been overhyped, and people don't really understand that no subscription meaning there will be less updates. Therefore, after people run out of content, that's it. They'll move on.

---

The amount of misinformation in this paragraph is incredible.

I really hope they prioritize active 1.0 players for the closed beta. I'm on at the very minimum 2 hours a day getting XP, crafting things, helping LS members with quests.

That whole shutting down the servers "some day in the near future" has me a bit worried. Less time to do things like Sword of La Noscea, missing dungeon and primal achievements, etc. Oh well, guess I'll have time to finish Quantum Conundrum and play the PC Dark Souls.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hycinthus

I think FFXIV ARR has a great chance actually. There aren't any MMOs scheduled for release in January - Feb 2013 is there?

I feel that GW2 will disappoint because it's been overhyped, and people don't really understand that no subscription meaning there will be less updates. Therefore, after people run out of content, that's it. They'll move on.

---

Actually, GW1 which also had no subscription had far more updates than XI or XIV had. So stop spreading misinformation, when the development team of GW2 have confirmed consistent game updates.

added in op

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reinheart

Gotta get back to work in RL so for now I got this much done https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...MwEi2VekQ/edit

I'll try to update the rest later when my workload gets less

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ingolf

Actually, GW1 which also had no subscription had far more updates than XI or XIV had. So stop spreading misinformation, when the development team of GW2 have confirmed consistent game updates.

---

Update Quality vs Update Quantity -- XI had much more in a lot of their updates, let alone expansions prior to XIV's development (WoTG era was slow due to this) than GW1 did in their update cycles. Even XIV had a lot more in certain updates than a handful of GW1 updates.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jennestia

Update Quality vs Update Quantity -- XI had much more in a lot of their updates, let alone expansions prior to XIV's development (WoTG era was slow due to this) than GW1 did in their update cycles. Even XIV had a lot more in certain updates than a handful of GW1 updates.

---

It also took XI about two years after selling their expansions to finish developing the content for said expansion.

It's easy to make it seem like you have awesome updates when your patches are what should have been in the box people bought. Nothing like paying full retail price for a registration code to be told to wait three months to actually play the next fraction of the expansion.

And XIV had some great updates. But for every 1.20, there was a 1.17 to balance things out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jennestia

Update Quality vs Update Quantity -- XI had much more in a lot of their updates, let alone expansions prior to XIV's development (WoTG era was slow due to this) than GW1 did in their update cycles. Even XIV had a lot more in certain updates than a handful of GW1 updates.

---

So the addition of sorrows furnace which was a gigantic end game event didn't constitute as a quality update? GW1 updates had a ton of content. You can take a look at Guild Wars Beyond, it has far more content than random errant patches in FFXI and XIV had.

TLDR: stop talking out of your ass.