i think i recall saying something about how it depends on the encounter back on page 1, right? funny, that. but anyway.
no, your logic is bad because you use anecdotal evidence. ('well *i've* seen this, but *i've never* seen that, therefore...') personal experience isn't proof. it's logically fallacious. and speaking of logical fallacies, you commit another one by bringing up my LS.
carry on, though
