It's not an attack, it's an observation. Make sure you refresh and reply faster next time as you multi-task.
Printable View
Another epeen thread I approve of!
You're sad to see an exploit being fixed?
I remember a time not too long ago when people here were asking for more difficult and dynamic content. Garuda gave us that, yet 95% of the playerbase chooses to abuse an exploit rendering what is actually a very fun and tactical fight into a plain old boring tank and spank encounter. That makes me sad.
I also find it Contradictory when people say.."WE WANT HARDER CONTENT" but when they release harder content... and people find an exploit that makes x Fight easier.. and SE tries to fix it.. they like.. " SE WHY U CHANGE THIS".
I love playing the game like the game was made for, Iffy, Moogle, Garuda are all Challenging fights.. that I want to fight them in a "Challenging" way, If someone tells me they found an exploit.. I just take the information.. but I won't use it unless the fight really becomes unbearable. However, if they are fixing an exploit.. then I'm all for that as well! =)
Just to be clear he has since edited his post to switch out pictures. So while I stand by the "no need to flame" comment for using the 3:30 method, I will flame his personal character for being a coward who lacks the conviction to at least stand by the method he used to go 7/7.