Well, but that's never the measure we use, tho'. We always measure by performance, not effort or investment, which means that people with better endowment will get the same results and thus rewards with far less effort than those with worse endowment.
If effort or investment were what we measured, a half-blind, partially paralyzed 80 year old with only one arm would be on even terms with a healthy and quick witted 20 year old. That just isn't possible when measuring by performance, though. Similar applies for genetical differences - some people have weaker bones, better reaction times, better ability to memorize, worse attention span etc. Not even going into early childhood development which is also outside of your control and has a heavy influence on your later perfomance.
Thus, measuring performance always partially rewards you for being lucky in the genetical roulette/the circumstances of your birth. As such, I never understood why someone should be rewarded for that. The Anima is probably a lot fairer in that regard, since your performance mostly affects how quickly you get it, less whether you get it at all - Almost anyone can do it if they put in the effort.
