people switching to other roles is "toxic"? but you just told people in another thread that if they don't like healing they should switch to another role. Which is it?
or is it another "fill my queue, stop having opinions" situation?
Printable View
Malia, if people would talk about the topic instead of desperatly trying to strike break it we would have a way healthier enviroment.
Your post does add to negativity not reduce it.
Also i will mention that this Strike also got the Attention of our Japanese Allies.
There thread about it is a really nice read even if i needed a translation tool. :)
I will also say that the english Community Manager basicly dont interact with anything here while the Japanese Side does maintain a moderation.
Which of course does fuel a feeling of abandonment which also add to the strike.
Evoker healer spec is also kinda damage healer too, more like assize with whm where you can heal and damage deal at the same time but almost every ability like that is a conal or line so positioning matters. could be another fun way to make sage interesting having damage+healing abilities that depend on positioning. can still keep the regen kardia stuff it does now but having extra attacks on cd where you to do that could be fun for sage.
they could do a lot of fun things with Sage if they moved away from "Scholar but streamlined"
In 5 days no one will remember this strike
conspiracy theory time, I think the reason why the barrier/pure healer split happened was just so they could make sage a simplified scholar then completely bloat scholar like they have been doing to make people want a complete remake of the job like summoner.